<-- Back to proposed bills
Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill - Sitting 18 (Afternoon)
24 November 2022
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
Christopher Chope is discussing New Clause 52 of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill, which aims to amend existing rules on registration of overseas entities by introducing a lower threshold for family members holding shares or voting rights. The statement addresses the proposed amendment to ensure an Order in Council requiring open registers of beneficial ownership in British Overseas Territories comes into force by June 30, 2023. Christopher Chope discusses the implementation delays of beneficial ownership registries in UK overseas territories and calls for strict deadlines to ensure their establishment. The statement addresses concerns about the implementation timeline for publicly accessible company registers in overseas territories and proposes a new clause to prohibit companies from high-risk jurisdictions from owning UK land. Kevin Hollinrake discusses New Clause 54 of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill, which aims to prevent the acquisition of land by companies registered in high-risk jurisdictions for anti-money laundering. The statement discusses a new clause that would require registered overseas entities to update beneficial ownership changes every six months instead of annually. The statement discusses a new clause aimed at enhancing transparency in the registration of trustees for trusts that own property in the UK. The statement discusses the issue of asset transparency and accountability regarding individuals like Usmanov who have been sanctioned for their actions. Christopher Chope is discussing two new clauses related to reporting requirements for cryptoasset businesses, focusing on enforcement capabilities of UK regulators and regulatory levels in Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories. The speaker discusses a new clause that provides a defense for individuals who disclose or publish information relevant to the investigation of economic crime. Liam Byrne discusses the issue of strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) filed by companies or oligarchs against journalists investigating economic crime. The MP is discussing the need for anti-SLAPP legislation in the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill. The MP is addressing the lack of a concrete date for comprehensive proposals to address economic crime and corporate transparency. The statement addresses the issue of unsupervised legal professionals engaging in regulated activities related to money laundering and economic crime. Christopher Chope is discussing new clauses related to civil asset recovery and criminal asset confiscation in cases of economic crime. The statement addresses the issue of unexplained wealth orders and the associated civil litigation costs, discussing potential funding mechanisms for enforcement agencies.
Action Requested
The MP proposes that the Government should accept the new clause in order to address the risk of criminals using family members to conceal beneficial ownership below the current 25% threshold. The speaker acknowledges previous government steps but argues further measures are needed to prevent such practices.
Key Facts
- New Clause 52 aims to amend Schedule 2 of the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022.
- It introduces a lower threshold of 5% for shares or voting rights held by family members.
- The current threshold for declaring ownership is set at 25%.
- New Clause 53 aims to amend the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018.
- The clause requires an Order in Council to come into effect no later than June 30, 2023.
- Mr. Kinnock acknowledges past efforts by Back Benchers to incorporate transparency requirements.
- Section 51 of the 2018 Act required beneficial ownership registries by the end of 2020.
- Overseas territories committed to introducing their own registers, with a deadline of December 2023.
- The FCDO is providing support through Open Ownership for establishing publicly accessible registers in overseas territories.
- Cayman Islands has completed a consultation on its register approach.
- BVI recently passed primary legislation for their register by the end of 2023.
- Anguilla received FCDO financing for a new public accessible register.
- New Clause 54 seeks to prevent land acquisition by companies in high-risk jurisdictions listed by the Financial Action Task Force.
- Jurisdictions on the taskforce’s list are updated three times a year and have committed to resolving deficiencies within agreed timeframes.
- The UK applies targeted sanctions to individuals from high-risk jurisdictions.
- New Clause 55 would amend the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022.
- Currently, companies must provide annual updates on changes in beneficial ownership.
- The new clause proposes reducing this period to six months.
- The new clause would amend the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022.
- Currently, trusts only need to declare the name of the trust on the register.
- The amendment seeks to disclose names of trustees, beneficiaries, settlers, granters or interested persons.
- Usmanov is an ex-Arsenal shareholder with assets worth over £100 million.
- He owns two properties in London and Surrey valued at £48 million and £34 million respectively.
- His close relatives now own properties in Italy, Latvia, Germany, and Spain.
- The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) must review its capacity to regulate cryptoasset businesses within six months after the Act comes into force.
- New clause 61 requires a review of the level of regulation of cryptoasset businesses in Crown Dependencies and UK Overseas Territories.
- A strategy for enhancing regulation will be published if serious deficiencies are identified.
- The new clause aims to offer a defense against actions based on the disclosure or publication of information relevant to investigating economic crime.
- It requires defendants to prove that their action was likely to be relevant and that they reasonably believed this relevance.
- The court must consider editorial judgement when determining reasonableness.
- The Foreign Policy Centre found that three-quarters of investigative journalists globally have received legal threats from this country.
- Jusan Technologies Ltd issued defamation proceedings against the Bureau of Investigative Journalism in August 2021.
- New clauses seek to protect disclosures related to the investigation of economic crime by equipping judges with the power to dismiss SLAPPs.
- The Minister acknowledges that the UK is leading on the issue at a national level.
- The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is reviewing firms suspected of SLAPP activity and issuing guidance to regulated professionals.
- New clause 64 focuses on anti-SLAPP provisions but extends further than what can be accommodated in the Bill.
- The Minister has not provided a hard date for comprehensive proposals despite previous consultations and analyses.
- The anti-SLAPP coalition will publish draft legislation at its second annual conference on Monday.
- The MP does not have sufficient numbers to press his new clauses to a vote in Committee but plans to reintroduce them later.
- New clause 66 aims to introduce a default supervisory authority for independent legal professionals not covered by any professional body listed in the Money Laundering Regulations.
- There are nine UK Professional Body Supervisors (PBSs) overseeing anti-money laundering activities across different jurisdictions.
- The Government's review identified concerns about unsupervised legal professionals in specific subsectors, such as specialist wills and estate planners.
- Clause 67 addresses civil asset recovery involving economic crime.
- Clause 68 deals with criminal asset confiscation following an unsuccessful prosecution.
- Four unexplained wealth orders introduced in 2018 have failed due to financial constraints faced by the National Crime Agency.
- The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 is the focus of the discussion.
- Bill Browder and Judge Mark Wolf expressed shock at the ability for successful litigants to claim costs in Government action challenges.
- Serco faces claims and costs from the Serious Fraud Office.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy