<-- Back to proposed bills
Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill - Sitting 17
24 November 2022
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The statement discusses new clauses for amendments related to Scottish partnership registration, civil recovery of terrorist cryptoassets, notification of dissolution in limited partnerships, and winding up dissolved limited partnerships. The statement introduces new clauses for amendments to existing legislation, focusing on enhancing the power of the court in winding up dissolved limited partnerships and changing company names under specific circumstances. Alison Thewliss is moving a new clause to the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill that requires disclosure of bank account information for subscribers to a company's memorandum of association. The statement addresses new clauses that require annual reporting on the effectiveness and impact of powers related to economic crime and corporate transparency, as well as provisions for strike-off powers and activities under the Act. Alison Thewliss supports new clauses that aim to enhance transparency and scrutiny of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill. Alison Thewliss discusses the importance of transparency and accountability in addressing economic crime through legislative measures. The MP is discussing new clauses in the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill, specifically focusing on new clause 26. The statement discusses new clauses related to economic crime, including a report into the merits of a fund for tackling economic crime, disqualification of directors convicted under the National Minimum Wage Act, and HMRC's anti-money laundering functions. The speaker addresses concerns about professional regulation and supervision within the financial services sector, highlighting the need for a robust regulatory framework to combat fraud and money laundering. The speaker discusses the failings in current anti-money laundering (AML) supervision by professional bodies and proposes new powers for OPBAS to address these issues. Alison Thewliss supports new clauses aimed at strengthening anti-money laundering supervisory duties and improving the effectiveness of the UK’s AML system. The statement discusses the proposed changes to strengthen the UK's anti-money laundering regime and introduces new clause 50 requiring all companies to have at least one director who is ordinarily resident in the UK. The statement discusses the proposal to require companies registering in the UK to have at least one director who is ordinarily resident in the UK. Stephen Kinnock is proposing a new clause to the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill to require overseas entities to disclose the beneficial ownership of UK-based assets.
Action Requested
New clauses have been introduced to amend the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill, including provisions on registering Scottish partnerships, a civil recovery regime for terrorist cryptoassets, notifying the registrar upon dissolution of limited partnerships, and allowing court orders for winding up dissolved limited partnerships based on public interest.
Key Facts
- New Clause 23 amends the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 to create a civil recovery regime for cryptoassets used in terrorism.
- New Clause 30 introduces a duty to notify the registrar upon dissolution of a limited partnership.
- New Clause 31 allows the court to wind up a limited partnership on grounds of public interest at the Secretary of State's request.
- New Clause 32 enables winding up dissolved limited partnerships.
- New Clause proposes changes to Limited Partnerships Act 1907.
- Amendment allows court orders for winding up of dissolved limited partnerships if required duties were not followed.
- New clauses amend sections in Companies Act 2006 regarding removal of old names from public inspection.
- New clause would require disclosure of jurisdiction of issuing banks for company and individual subscriber bank accounts.
- Clause aims to flag potential fraud or dubious activities involving UK registered companies with foreign bank accounts.
- Proposal seeks to add transparency for Companies House in identifying legitimate business operations.
- The first report must be published within one year of this Act being passed.
- Each subsequent annual report must provide a breakdown of the registrar’s annual expenditure.
- Reports will include data on the number of companies struck off by the registrar and the amount of fines issued.
- New clause 26 introduces a reporting requirement for the Secretary of State to assess the sufficiency of powers available to Companies House.
- Each annual report would provide data on the number of companies struck off, fines issued, criminal convictions, and referrals to law enforcement bodies.
- New clause 28 requires reports on whether mechanisms exist to prosecute directors of struck-off companies and recoup money for creditors.
- The new clause aims to ensure regular updates on the implementation of the Bill's provisions.
- There are concerns about unscrupulous companies evading creditors through dissolution processes.
- Companies House already reports publicly on its activities and statistical releases.
- New clause 26 requires an assessment of whether the powers available to the Secretary of State and the registrar are sufficient.
- It asks for data on company incorporations by Authorised Company Service Providers.
- The MP wants confirmation that all subsections in new clause 26 will be explicitly covered elsewhere.
- New Clause 29 requires a report into the merits of a fund for tackling economic crime to be laid before Parliament within six months.
- New Clause 35 would disqualify individuals convicted under section 31 of the National Minimum Wage Act from serving as company directors without High Court leave.
- New Clause 44 would require HMRC to treat its anti-money laundering supervision function as a priority equal to other functions.
- £290 billion lost in fraud and money laundering comprises 14.5% of GDP.
- The Office for Professional Body Anti-Money Laundering Supervision (OPBAS) supervises 25 organisations, primarily in legal and accounting professions.
- HMRC is responsible for supervising trusts and company service providers but does not take the job seriously according to the speaker.
- 81% of professional bodies were not supervising their members effectively, according to the 2021 OPBAS review.
- Half of supervisors did not ensure timely action on money laundering procedures.
- 60% of law firms visited by SRA in 2021 failed to comply with AML controls fully.
- The highest AML fine for a law firm by SRA was £232,500 compared to potential FCA fines of £5.4 million under similar powers.
- CLC imposed zero fines despite finding two-thirds of firms non-compliant in 2019-2020.
- The Law Society of Northern Ireland fined only one firm out of 228 cases found non-compliant with AML regulations.
- New clause 44 asks HMRC to prioritise its anti-money laundering supervisory function.
- The Treasury Committee’s economic crime report highlights that some 30,000 businesses fall into the bracket for supervision.
- According to a September 2021 report, over 80% of professional body supervisors had not implemented an effective risk-based approach and only a third were effective in developing adequate risk profiles.
- HMRC carried out 3,500 formal compliance inspections with businesses last year.
- HMRC issued over £2.5 million of penalties in 2021-22.
- In October 2022, HMRC fined 68 estate agents a collective total of £519,000 for breaching anti-money laundering regulations.
- New clause 50 aims to require all companies registering in the UK to have at least one person who ordinarily resides in the UK among their directors.
- The proposal has been considered and rejected before due to concerns over freedom of business and lack of enforcement benefits.
- Companies House is expected to work with the NCA to put in place systems for raising red flags during company registration processes.
- Stephen Kinnock proposes a new clause to address perceived loopholes in the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022.
- The Financial Action Task Force highlights distinctions between company ownership and ultimate beneficial ownership of assets.
- Kevin Hollinrake argues that current requirements already cover disclosure of beneficial owners.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy