<-- Back to proposed bills

Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill - Sitting 11

15 November 2022

Proposing MP
Tewkesbury
Type
Public Bill Committee

At a Glance

Issue Summary

The statement discusses amendments and new clauses to include costs related to Northern Ireland departments in Companies House fees, set a minimum fee for company incorporation, and require annual inflation adjustments to the fee. Stephen Kinnock is discussing amendment 115 and new clauses related to increasing registration fees for Companies House. Laurence Robertson addresses concerns about the proposed fee for registering companies and emphasizes the need for better funding of Companies House to combat economic crime. The statement discusses the funding and enforcement capabilities of Companies House in relation to economic crime. The statement addresses the funding and resources required for Companies House to effectively combat economic crime. Laurence Robertson discusses the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill and addresses concerns about fee levels for Companies House. The statement addresses the proposed amendment to clause 90 of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill, which aims to allow the Registrar at Companies House to share non-public information with insolvency practitioners. The statement discusses amendments to the Companies Act 2006 to enhance data sharing powers for the registrar and local authorities. The speakers discuss the provisions of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill, focusing on information sharing between organisations and the need for measures that facilitate better cooperation with local authorities. The statement addresses concerns about data sharing between central government and local authorities in the context of economic crime prevention. Laurence Robertson discusses amendments to the Companies Act 2006 and the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 regarding false statement offences. Laurence Robertson discusses establishing a fund for tackling economic crime. The speaker discusses the need for increased funding and resources to combat economic crime through the establishment of an economic crime fund. The statement discusses the proposed changes to the Companies Act regarding the power of the registrar to impose financial penalties on individuals for relevant offences. Laurence Robertson is discussing clauses related to economic crime and corporate transparency in the UK parliamentary statement. Laurence Robertson is addressing provisions related to limited partnerships and the registration of persons with significant control. Margaret Hodge discusses the need for transparency in corporate structures to prevent economic crime, focusing on the importance of registering persons of significant control (PSC) for all limited partnerships.

Action Requested

Amendments propose including costs from Northern Ireland departments' functions under disqualification orders and insolvency legislation into Companies House fee regulations. New clauses aim to establish a £100 fee for company registration with an annual adjustment based on inflation and mandate a report within three months of the Act's passage on retaining incorporation fees by Companies House.

Key Facts

  • Amendment allows inclusion of costs from Northern Ireland departments under disqualification orders and insolvency legislation.
  • New clause sets a minimum £100 fee for company registration with annual adjustments based on inflation.
  • Report required within three months after the Act's passage on retaining incorporation fees by Companies House.
  • The current registration fee is £12.
  • A minimum fee of £50 (new clause 25) or £100 (new clause 33) is proposed.
  • New clause 40 would require a review and report on measures to retain revenue from fees for reinvestment in anti-economic crime efforts.
  • The current cost to register a company is £12.
  • A provisional driving licence fee application costs £34, while a passport is £75.50 and citizenship costs £1,330.
  • Kevin Brewer's case against Companies House highlights the need for better data verification.
  • The National Crime Agency obtained fewer than five prosecutions annually for economic crime in recent years.
  • The Serious Fraud Office saw its prosecutions cut by a third but secured a significant £280 million fine from Glencore last week.
  • The US increased its expenditure on enforcement against economic crime by 30% while the UK cut the FCA budget by 4% in the latest spending review.
  • Only about £100 million, or approximately £32 million annually, is allocated for economic crime from the private sector contribution.
  • The UK has been identified as a centre for money laundering scandals involving Russian, Troika, and Azerbaijani laundromats.
  • Some of the biggest money-laundering scandals have involved UK corporate structures, with about 40% of laundered funds through Danske Bank coming via UK structures.
  • There has only been one prosecution for money-laundering related to economic crime in the country.
  • Kevin Hollinrake acknowledges that Companies House has been under-resourced historically.
  • He disputes claims that recent fee reductions are solely due to current government policies.
  • The minister states that Companies House fees will be set based on actual resource needs and ringfenced for specific use.
  • Kevin Hollinrake suggests that the fee level should not deter legitimate business activity.
  • Companies House funding comes from fees charged to companies, which cover costs including enforcement.
  • The Department will work with Companies House to determine appropriate fee levels and ensure parliamentary scrutiny.
  • Clause 90 amends the Companies Act 2006 to allow information disclosure.
  • The proposed amendment would enable the Registrar to share non-public information with insolvency practitioners upon request.
  • Insolvency Practitioners (R3) recommend access to non-public information for investigative purposes.
  • Clause 90 enhances data sharing powers of the registrar.
  • Schedule 3 amends the Companies Act 2006 and Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2002.
  • New clause 36 would give the Secretary of State power to make regulations for disclosing PSC information from companies to local authorities.
  • Clause 90 widens disclosure provisions with offences and defences set out in subsections (5) and (6).
  • Schedule 3 amends Companies Act enabling registrar to disclose usual residential addresses.
  • New clause 36 aims to address gaps in information sharing with local authorities, particularly regarding economic crime enforcement issues.
  • Data sharing is consistent with similar legislation dealing with data protection.
  • Local authorities are a subset of public authorities and can benefit from data sharing provisions.
  • The provision applies in situations of risk of harm, serious risk of violence or intimidation.
  • Clause 94 amends section 1112 of the Companies Act 2006.
  • Clause 95 allows the Secretary of State to issue certificates for national security or serious crime prevention/detection.
  • Serious crime is defined in alignment with section 18 of the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022.
  • Amendment 80 aims to establish a fund for tackling economic crime through regulations.
  • New clause 29 requires a report into the merits of a fund for tackling economic crime to be laid before Parliament within six months after the Act's passage.
  • The UK’s enforcement expenditure is 0.042% of GDP, while the cost of economic crime to the UK economy is 14.5%.
  • Between 2018 and 2021, £3.9 billion was brought in through fines, confiscation, and forfeiture.
  • Only 40% of the £354 million recovered from confiscation orders, forfeiture orders, and civil recovery orders went back into fighting crime.
  • Clause 96 provides a framework for the registrar to impose direct financial penalties up to £10,000 without lengthy court proceedings.
  • Clause 96 inserts new section 1132A into the Companies Act 2006.
  • The regulations will be subject to the affirmative procedure for parliamentary scrutiny.
  • Section 3 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 is amended so that financial penalties can count as defaults.
  • Clause 97 clarifies that individuals subject to civil penalties will be treated similarly to those with criminal convictions regarding disqualification from serving as company directors.
  • The provisions in clause 97 are extended to Northern Ireland under clause 98.
  • Clause 99 aims to clarify the meaning of 'limited partnership' and remove ambiguity by aligning it with the Limited Partnerships Act 1907 and Companies Act 2006.
  • Schedule 4 outlines the information to be provided by limited partnerships and their prospective partners.
  • General partners must report partner information or face dissolution proceedings if non-compliant.
  • The Secretary of State may designate a standard system for classifying limited partnership business activities.
  • Limited partnerships have been used by criminals to move and hide dirty money.
  • In 2014, the US imposed sanctions on the Rotenberg brothers who used an English limited partnership called Sinara Company to evade sanctions.
  • Transparency International’s report analysed 1,628 limited liability partnerships over a 12-year period, finding that Russians were the most frequent nationality (17%), followed by UK nationals (16%) and Ukrainians (15%).
  • Finance Uncovered and the BBC found that five busiest formation agencies in 2017 created 28% of all English limited partnerships.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy