<-- Back to proposed bills

Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill - Sitting 7

03 November 2022

Proposing MP
Thirsk and Malton
Type
Public Bill Committee

At a Glance

Issue Summary

The statement discusses amendments to the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill aimed at disqualifying individuals subject to asset-freezing sanctions from acting as company directors, while excluding those sanctioned for reasons unrelated to asset control. The statement addresses the criteria for disqualifying individuals from being company directors based on their sanctions status. Kevin Hollinrake discusses the criteria for disqualifying individuals from being company directors under UK sanctions regulations. The statement addresses concerns over corporate transparency and the prevention of economic crime through changes proposed in the Bill. The MP discusses concerns regarding the impact of delinquent nominee directors under current UK law and questions the government's progress in implementing regulations from the 2015 Act. The speaker discusses an amendment aimed at improving communication between Companies House and enforcement authorities regarding sanctioned individuals. The statement discusses the need to improve the UK's sanctions regime and Companies House's role in corporate transparency. The statement discusses the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill, focusing on the balance between legislative direction and organisational autonomy for Companies House in sharing information with other agencies. Kevin Hollinrake discusses amendments related to disqualification of directors subject to sanctions and those convicted under the National Minimum Wage Act. The statement discusses the introduction of new clauses in the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill aimed at enhancing company director verification and disqualification processes. Seema Malhotra discusses clauses 36 to 43 of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill, focusing on director disqualification, identity verification, and reporting requirements.

Action Requested

The amendments aim to ensure that only designated persons subject to asset-freeze measures are disqualified from being company directors, rather than extending the ban to broader categories of people whose sanction status is not related to assets. The policy will take effect in England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland.

Key Facts

  • Government amendment 1 aims to prohibit individuals subject to an asset freeze from acting as directors after the clause comes into force.
  • Individuals in breach of this prohibition can face up to two years' imprisonment or a fine.
  • The amendments narrow the definition to only include designated persons under asset-freeze measures, excluding those sanctioned for reasons unrelated to assets.
  • The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office does not designate people for non-asset freeze financial sanctions.
  • Travel bans are considered a type of non-asset freeze sanction.
  • Amendments to the Bill aim to prevent automatic director disqualification measures from applying to individuals subject to travel bans or similar sanctions.
  • Amendment 93 seeks to expand the criteria for disqualifying individuals from being company directors to include those suspected of facilitating evasion of UK sanctions.
  • Any person enabling or facilitating the evasion of certain sanctions would already be committing an offence under regulation 19 of the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, with a maximum penalty of seven years in prison or a fine.
  • The clause limits the scope that prohibition by disapplying it for several types of organisations such as building societies and charitable incorporated organisations.
  • The Bill enables regulations to ban corporate directorships unless all directors are actual persons and ID-verified.
  • Individuals exerting significant control over companies must be named and ID-verified under the definitions in the Bill.
  • The Bill addresses both ownership and directors, with a focus on making person of significant control information public.
  • The World Bank report explained how nominee directors can neglect duties and fail to submit accounts.
  • Delinquent nominee directors are not UK residents in most cases and tend to claim legal immunity.
  • The Foreign Affairs Committee report concluded that the UK is financing President Putin’s war in Ukraine through laundered assets.
  • The amendment targets issues where designated individuals move their assets before sanctions take effect.
  • In July 2022, OFSI issued a red alert detailing evasion tactics used by sanctioned individuals.
  • Usmanov transferred shares in his London property firm to Metalloinvest days before being sanctioned.
  • Petr Aven, worth £5.3 billion, was sanctioned but allowed to use part of his assets for living expenses.
  • The current sanctions regime and supervision at Companies House are considered unfit for purpose.
  • Approximately 1,200 individuals and 120 businesses have been sanctioned since Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
  • Companies House does not currently have the power to bring about suspended directorships.
  • The Bill facilitates information sharing among relevant agencies.
  • Glencore has pleaded guilty to failing to prevent bribery, highlighting the effectiveness of current legislation in some cases.
  • Any director acting outside the terms of the legislation could face jail time for up to two years.
  • Amendments 4, 5, and 6 modify clause 34 of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill.
  • New clause 35 proposes adding a disqualification for individuals convicted under section 31 of the National Minimum Wage Act 1998.
  • These amendments aim to strengthen measures against sanctioned individuals and those who violate minimum wage laws.
  • The Bill introduces a prohibition on individuals acting as company directors without verified identity.
  • There have been 16 people convicted under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998.
  • Clause 37 establishes exemptions to the general natural person director rule through regulations following the Bill's enactment.
  • Clause 36 inserts proposed new sections 159A and 169A into the Companies Act to prevent disqualified individuals from being appointed as directors.
  • Clause 37 amends section 87 of the 2015 Act to ensure that shadow directors remain liable for contraventions even after removal.
  • Clause 39 introduces provisions requiring director ID verification or specified exemptions, with penalties for non-compliance.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy