<-- Back to proposed bills
Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill - Sitting 4 (Afternoon)
27 October 2022
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The statement discusses perceptions of London as a center for money laundering and concerns about the verification regime proposed in the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill. The discussion revolves around the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill and its impact on various financial sectors including accountancy firms. Hannah Bardell is chairing a session on the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill, focusing on questions from committee members to witnesses. Peter Swabey, policy and research director at the Chartered Governance Institute UK & Ireland, discusses the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill and its implications for corporate governance. Peter Swabey discusses the current process for registering companies in the UK and its vulnerabilities to fraudulent activities. Hannah Bardell is chairing the examination of witnesses regarding the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill. Hannah Bardell is addressing the topic of economic crime and corporate transparency in the UK, specifically discussing the need for anti-SLAPP legislation. Hannah Bardell emphasizes the importance of brief responses during a discussion on economic crime and corporate transparency. Hannah Bardell introduces Professor Jason Sharman to provide evidence on the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill. Professor Jason Sharman discusses the weaknesses in UK's enforcement of anti-money laundering laws and the ease with which companies can be registered for illicit purposes. Hannah Bardell reminds her colleague that questions must relate to the legislation under discussion. Hannah Bardell is concluding the session with Professor Jason Sharman's testimony regarding economic crime and corporate transparency.
Action Requested
No specific action is requested, but Angela Foyle suggests that the Bill could be strengthened to clarify standards expected for verification measures and ensure consistency with risk-based approaches. She also notes the importance of considering indirect information-sharing provisions for accountancy firms to combat illicit finance effectively.
Key Facts
- London is perceived as one of the key capitals of money due to its status as a large financial center.
- The Bill proposes two forms of verification by either Companies House or authorised corporate service providers.
- The Financial Action Task Force standards define “person with significant control” as someone owning 25% or more.
- Accountancy firms could benefit from pre-emptive access to intelligence on suspicious financial movements.
- OPBAS issued £117,000 in fines totalling 39 penalties as of 2019-20 figures.
- Insolvency practitioners may facilitate certain activities with exemptions for tainted funds.
- Hannah Bardell is chairing a session on the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill.
- The session includes questions from committee members to witnesses regarding regulation, policing roles, and professional responsibilities.
- Committee members request that their questions be delivered to the witnesses in writing for further elaboration.
- Peter Swabey is the policy and research director at the Chartered Governance Institute UK & Ireland.
- The Bill aims to give Companies House additional powers that it previously lacked.
- Swabey suggests requiring company secretaries in larger private companies, not just public companies.
- The current process for registering companies lacks robust security measures.
- Swabey suggests significant verification of ownership and identity for authorised company service providers.
- There is a need to address economic crime through director obligations but the Bill's scope should remain focused.
- Catherine Belton, journalist and author, gave evidence via Zoom.
- Seema Malhotra asked about gaps in legislation to tackle economic crime on a national and international scale.
- Catherine Belton highlighted the need for anti-SLAPP legislation and adequate funding for public watchdogs like the Serious Fraud Office.
- Catherine Belton testified about Russian money laundering through UK LLPs.
- Chatham House had to remove a mention of a convicted Tory donor from a report due to SLAPP concerns.
- The Ministry of Justice proposed criteria for judges to decide if cases are SLAPP cases.
- Catherine Belton discusses the role of LLPs in Russian money laundering schemes.
- The Moldovan laundromat used UK-based LLPs to move $14 billion out of Russia over four years.
- Danske Bank handled illicit Russian cash totaling around $200 billion over a decade.
- Professor Jason Sharman is a professor of international relations at Cambridge University.
- Professor Sharman studies money laundering and corruption by impersonating would-be corrupt officials, money launderers, and terrorist financiers.
- The Bill aims to reduce the attractiveness of the UK as a destination for economic crime.
- Professor Sharman notes the UK has a good reputation for probity but lacks rigorous enforcement.
- It takes about 10 minutes to register a shell company in the UK, compared to close to two weeks in British Virgin Islands with higher fees.
- External entities such as journalists and NGOs could be more effectively utilized by regulatory agencies.
- Hannah Bardell reminded Liam Byrne about the relevance of questioning to the current bill.
- The Bill is focused on economic crime and corporate transparency.
- Hannah Bardell moves to conclude the session.
- Professor Jason Sharman's testimony is about economic crime and corporate transparency.
- No specific new policy or legislative changes are proposed by Hannah Bardell.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy