<-- Back to proposed bills
National Security Bill - Sitting 9
06 September 2022
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The statement addresses delays and changes in Ministerial roles affecting the progress of the National Security Bill. James Gray addresses whether the Public Bill Committee for the National Security Bill should sit later that day. The statement discusses the management and continuation of the National Security Bill in the absence of a minister with detailed knowledge of the bill.
Action Requested
No specific action is proposed, but the speaker expresses dissatisfaction with the current situation and calls for clarification on why the Minister for Security did not attend the Committee session.
Key Facts
- The National Security Bill has faced delays and changes in leadership.
- There have been four Ministers involved in the Bill's progress.
- The Minister for Security indicated his intention to resign but continue until a new appointment was made.
- The discussion revolves around scheduling for the National Security Bill.
- There are concerns about proper scrutiny and time constraints for amendments.
- The absence of the current Minister and potential delays in appointing a new one is highlighted.
- The National Security Bill is described as detailed and far-reaching.
- There are worries about whether a new Minister will be capable of answering intricate questions related to the bill.
- The Committee intends to adjourn until Thursday unless there are objections.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy