<-- Back to proposed bills

National Security Bill - Sitting 5

14 July 2022

Proposing MP
Bethnal Green and Stepney
Type
Public Bill Committee

At a Glance

Issue Summary

The statement discusses the National Security Bill's clauses aimed at addressing state threats through aggravating factors applicable to existing offences. The statement addresses the National Security Bill, specifically clauses related to sentencing aggravation and search powers for state actor threats. The statement addresses concerns regarding clause 23 of the National Security Bill. The statement discusses the introduction of new powers for police searches and seizures under Schedule 2 of the National Security Bill. The statement discusses concerns about the National Security Bill's provisions regarding entry, search and seizure powers, particularly focusing on production orders for confidential material. The statement discusses Clause 21 of the National Security Bill, which grants enhanced arrest powers to police for state threat activity similar to those under the Terrorism Act 2000. Rushanara Ali is discussing the National Security Bill, specifically addressing concerns about Schedule 3 powers and the designation of places for detention. The statement discusses the National Security Bill's provision for designating places where individuals can be detained after arrest under foreign power threat activity. Rushanara Ali is discussing government amendments related to the indefinite retention of biometric data for individuals previously convicted of certain offences. The statement discusses technical amendments to the National Security Bill concerning biometric data retention and use by various police forces. Amendments are being made to Schedule 3 of the National Security Bill to remove unnecessary references and clarify provisions for data retention and identification of responsible chief officers. The statement addresses amendments to clause 22 of the National Security Bill, which aims to modify the definition of protected materials in border security checks. The statement discusses the drafting of clause 22, which amends schedule 3 to the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019, allowing examining officers access to confidential business records without judicial authorisation.

Action Requested

The government aims to ensure that judges factor in state threat connections when sentencing individuals convicted of crimes linked to state activity, similar to how terrorism is currently handled. The clauses will also apply to service courts and future-proof the bill by allowing for evolving threats.

Key Facts

  • Aggravating factors in clauses 16 to 18 apply where a foreign power condition is met.
  • Currently, there is no formal mechanism requiring judges to factor state threat connections into sentencing decisions.
  • The service courts system applies to those bound by the Armed Forces Act 2006.
  • Clause 20 introduces schedule 2 which provides police with powers of search and seizure.
  • These new powers enable police to intervene earlier before a crime is committed based on reasonable suspicion.
  • The existing power of search in section 9 of the Official Secrets Act 1911 is replaced.
  • The Minister is not taking interventions at this time.
  • Clause 20 introduces Schedule 2 to the National Security Bill.
  • Schedule 2 allows for pre-emptive searches and seizures based on reasonable suspicion of state threat activity.
  • Part 1 of Schedule 2 covers England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, while Part 2 is adapted for Scotland.
  • A production order must meet four conditions to grant access to confidential material.
  • Government amendment 12 ensures court rules can be amended to reflect specific requirements for warrant applications.
  • The government's powers relating to 'great emergency' were used eight times between 2017 and 2022.
  • Part 1 of the Bill includes provisions for production orders regarding confidential material with a seven-day deadline unless extended by a judge.
  • An amendment was made to enable Northern Ireland magistrates’ courts rules to make provision about proceedings under Schedule 2.
  • Police can currently rely on powers under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, but require enhanced powers similar to those in the Terrorism Act 2000 for state threats.
  • Clause 21 creates a new arrest power allowing police to arrest individuals suspected of foreign power threat activity without a warrant.
  • Individuals arrested under clause 21 can be detained for up to 48 hours, subject to periodic reviews.
  • The amendment addresses Schedule 3 powers in the National Security Bill.
  • It proposes independent inspections for any place designated as a detention location.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential designation of places like Mildenhall airbase.
  • There are five TACT suites in England and Wales.
  • The Bill allows the Secretary of State to designate places for detention after arrest.
  • Paragraph 1(1) states that the Secretary of State may designate places, including police stations or other suitable facilities.
  • The amendments cover indefinite retention of biometric data under certain circumstances.
  • Data Protection Act 2018 requires ongoing review of retention.
  • Amendments mirror provisions in Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) and Terrorism Acts.
  • Amendments 16 and 17 separate the reference for Northern Ireland's Chief Constable from those in England and Wales.
  • Amendments 14, 25, and 27 address unnecessary duplication in database lists.
  • Amendment 26 allows data obtained under schedule 9 to be searched against Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011 data.
  • Amendments 19 and 32 add the British Transport police and Ministry of Defence police to those that can make national security determinations for up to five years, with renewal options.
  • Amendments made: 14-24.
  • Removes reference to paragraph 42 of Schedule 3 in the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019.
  • Enables Chief Constables of Ministry of Defence Police and British Transport Police Force to make national security determinations.
  • Clarifies identity of responsible chief officer of police for fingerprints or samples taken by specific forces.
  • Clause 22 modifies the definition of confidential business material within the scope of protected materials under schedule 3.
  • Currently, the Investigatory Powers Commissioner must authorise the retention and examination of protected materials, a process that can take up to six weeks.
  • The new safeguard requires a counter-terrorism police officer at least superintendent rank to authorise access to such material.
  • Clause 22 amends schedule 3 to allow examining officers access to confidential business records without judicial authorisation.
  • Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 does not require judicial approval for retention of confidential business records found during stops in public places.
  • Investigatory Powers Commissioner supports the Home Office’s proposals to align the definition of confidential material with the Investigatory Powers Act 2016.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy