<-- Back to proposed bills

Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill

12 July 2022

Proposing MP
Kettering
Type
Public Bill Committee

At a Glance

Issue Summary

The statement addresses the challenge of long-term empty dwellings in England and proposes changes to the Local Government Finance Act 1992 to reduce the threshold for applying an additional council tax premium on empty properties. Philip Hollobone discusses amendments related to defining the conditions under which a dwelling can be considered occupied periodically. The speaker discusses amendments aimed at reducing the period for defining a property as vacant from one year to six months in order to address housing challenges such as short-term holiday lets and neglected properties. The MP discusses the challenges of empty dwellings and second homes in relation to the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill. The statement discusses an amendment aimed at introducing fines for providing misleading or inaccurate information about property occupancy. MP Philip Hollobone is discussing amendments to clause 73 regarding exemptions from higher council tax rates for properties affected by bereavement and dilapidation. The statement discusses amendments to the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill aimed at providing exemptions for properties affected by bereavement or renovation. The statement addresses the introduction of a council tax premium on second homes to address concerns about their negative impact on local communities and services. MP Rachael Maskell proposes an amendment requiring cultural, historical, and archaeological significance to be considered before changing street names. The amendment proposes to add criteria for local authorities when considering the renaming of a street. The Opposition member Alex Norris discusses concerns about the method of changing street names proposed by the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill, specifically regarding the requirement for referendums. The statement discusses the importance of proper consultation with community stakeholders for street name changes proposed under the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill. The statement discusses the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill's clause regarding local support for street name changes. The MP is addressing the process of considering comments and suggestions to expedite impact assessments related to a legislative clause.

Action Requested

Clause 72 would amend section 11B of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, changing the definition of 'long-term empty dwelling' from two years to one year and allowing councils to charge up to four times the standard council tax bill for homes left empty for more than 10 years. The clause will take effect in financial years beginning on or after April 1, 2024.

Key Facts

  • Councils can currently increase the premium depending on how long a property has been empty.
  • Nearly every council uses the powers to charge extra council tax on homes left empty for more than two years.
  • The amendment will change the definition of 'long-term empty dwelling' from two years to one year.
  • Clause 72 takes effect in financial years starting April 1, 2024.
  • Amendment 79 seeks to define how long a property must be empty to be described as occupied periodically.
  • Amendment 80 aims to provide further definition around conditions of occupancy.
  • The amendments aim to reduce the definition of a vacant property period from one year to six months.
  • Residents in York have seen around 2,000 short-term holiday lets encroach on future housing use.
  • A 45-hectare brownfield site in York is currently prioritized for luxury apartments that may not be lived in.
  • Empty dwelling management orders allow local authorities to requisition an empty home and turn it into a social rented property for seven years.
  • EDMOs act as a warning shot to other landlords, showing what might happen if they do not make good use of their properties.
  • The process of using EDMOs is lengthy, laborious, expensive and difficult.
  • The amendment seeks to address fraud in the council tax system.
  • It aims to provide an incentive for people to declare properties accurately.
  • The amendment could help local authorities recover extra revenue without increasing expenditure.
  • Amendment 83 would extend the period for making arrangements following a bereavement.
  • Amendment 84 aims to provide owners of dilapidated properties with one year after acquiring the property to refurbish before additional council tax rates apply.
  • The amendments address practical and sensitive issues related to occupied dwellings.
  • Amendment 83 aims to exempt inherited properties from a second homes premium for at least two years.
  • Amendment 84 proposes an exemption of at least one year for properties requiring improvement.
  • Current protections allow for a six-month exemption after probate is granted if the property remains unoccupied.
  • Second homes can benefit local economies but also cause negative effects like hollowing out communities.
  • The Government is investing £11.5 billion in the affordable homes programme to deliver up to 180,000 affordable homes.
  • Proposed new section 11D(3) allows for variation of the maximum council tax premium on second homes through affirmative resolution.
  • Amendment 85 proposes adding consideration of historical, cultural, and archaeological factors to clause 74.
  • York has many streets named gates, bars, and pubs reflecting its layered history.
  • Maskell meets regularly with archaeologists and historians in York.
  • The amendment aims to replace a power for referendums on street names with requirements for local authorities to consult residents and the wider community.
  • Community representatives include individuals or bodies appearing to represent people who live, work in, or visit the area.
  • Local authorities must publish proposals on their website and erect notices in the affected streets.
  • The Bill requires local authorities to run referendums before changing street names.
  • Amendments 70 to 72 aim to provide practical alternatives that ensure resident consultation without mandatory referenda.
  • Local Government Association research indicates there is no evidence of councils changing street names without consulting residents.
  • The Government consulted on the reform of street naming, receiving 91% agreement that regulations should set out how local authorities seek consent for changing a street name.
  • Changing residential street names can lead to significant costs for individuals in amending property titles and other documents.
  • Secondary legislation will provide clear processes for consultation while maintaining flexibility for updates.
  • Current legislation has not been reviewed since 1907.
  • Three different systems apply depending on where people live in the UK.
  • 75% of respondents agreed that electoral roll members should have a decisive say on street name changes.
  • The discussion is regarding Clause 74 of the Bill.
  • Schedule 5 has been agreed upon.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy