<-- Back to proposed bills

Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill

28 June 2022

Proposing MP
North Antrim
Type
Public Bill Committee

At a Glance

Issue Summary

Ian Paisley Jnr discusses amendments related to establishing an independent evaluating body to assess the government's progress in delivering levelling-up missions. Alex Norris discusses the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill and proposes amendments for independent scrutiny of levelling up missions. The speaker is outlining procedural instructions for debate in the Public Bill Committee. Rachael Maskell emphasizes the importance of independent evaluation and scrutiny for the levelling-up missions proposed in Clause 1 of the Bill. The MPs discuss the importance of establishing an independent body to scrutinize the Government's progress on levelling-up missions. Neil O'Brien is discussing the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill, which aims to reduce geographic disparities in productivity, health, incomes, and opportunities. The statement addresses the importance of establishing an independent body for levelling-up missions similar to the Climate Change Committee to ensure rigorous scrutiny and public accessibility. The statement addresses the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill's approach to independent scrutiny of government functions. The statement addresses the need for transparency regarding government resources allocated for levelling-up initiatives. The statement discusses the effectiveness of current government funding and investment strategies under the levelling-up agenda. The statement addresses the need for accurate resource allocation and recognition of rural England's unique challenges under the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill. MP Patricia Gibson discusses Amendment 13 which requires the Government to publish resources allocated for levelling-up initiatives. The MP discusses the government's efforts to improve data quality and transparency for levelling-up initiatives. Ian Paisley Jnr interrupts Alex Norris to correct him for straying from the topic of levelling-up and regeneration. The statement discusses the challenges and critiques of the current levelling-up initiatives and funding mechanisms proposed by the UK government. The MP is discussing the need for local determination in government programmes and expresses doubt about the Government's ability to defend its policies against criticism from the Public Accounts Committee.

Action Requested

Paisley proposes several amendments that would require annual reports on levelling-up missions to include evaluations from an independent body, and a new clause for assigning this role to monitor and recommend improvements in the delivery of these missions.

Key Facts

  • Amendments 3, 5, 10, and 12 are related to establishing an independent evaluating body.
  • New clause 1 would require the Secretary of State to assign an independent body to assess progress on levelling-up missions and make recommendations for improvements.
  • The independent body would prepare parallel reports that assess progress in delivering each mission and recommend actions for future delivery.
  • Amendment 3 would require independent scrutiny of levelling up missions.
  • Clause 2 requires annual statements on progress towards levelling-up missions.
  • The Levelling Up Advisory Council advises on levelling up but lacks independence from the Government.
  • Back Benchers are called first followed by Front Benchers.
  • No need to 'bob' for Back Benchers wishing to speak.
  • Clause 1 deals with the levelling-up missions: what, when and how.
  • Independent evaluation is crucial to prevent skewing or concealing of progress.
  • The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) provides an example of independent scrutiny in other areas like climate issues.
  • Hackitt report on Grenfell highlights intersectionality in addressing complex issues.
  • The Bill lacks accountability measures for each of the 12 levelling-up missions.
  • Amendments 3, 5, 10, and 12 seek to address the lack of accountability.
  • An independent body is proposed to oversee and judge progress on levelling up.
  • Levelling up is a moral, social, and economic programme for the whole of government.
  • The Levelling Up Advisory Council includes Katherine Bennett, Sir Tim Besley, Sir Paul Collier, Cathy Gormley-Hennan, Sally Mapstone, Laxman Narasimhan, Sacha Romanovitch, Hayaatun Sillem, and Sir Nigel Wilson.
  • The Government will produce an annual report on progress against levelling-up missions.
  • The statement discusses the importance of independent bodies like the Climate Change Committee in holding the Government accountable.
  • Ian Paisley Jnr reminds Members that they have time for line-by-line scrutiny of the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill.
  • Alex Norris expresses his enjoyment of these detailed discussions, highlighting their significance in understanding how amendments will be addressed.
  • The statement includes an Opposition amendment to the Bill.
  • Listed regulators like Ofsted, Ofgem, and Ofcom are cited as comparisons.
  • The Levelling Up Advisory Council is mentioned with its esteemed members.
  • Amendment 13 proposes to require the Government to publish resources allocated to communities for levelling-up.
  • The Public Accounts Committee reported billions of pounds wasted on ill-thought-out plans through levelling-up funds.
  • Nottingham, Gloucestershire, and East Sussex are cited as examples where gains from levelling-up funds do not offset cuts in central government funding.
  • The high street fund has been distributed in various parts of the country without achieving long-term economic growth.
  • Local authorities have spent hundreds of thousands of pounds on bids for competitions, with only one winner.
  • York's biotech industry, rail and transport cluster, and creative arts sector are potential areas for investment to bring about significant job creation and skill enhancement.
  • BioYorkshire aims to upskill 25,000 people and create 4,000 new jobs as part of a green new deal initiative in York.
  • The Rural Services Network research indicates that if rural England were a separate region, it would perform more poorly than every other geographical region of England.
  • In Cumbria, fewer than 500 people are unemployed in the constituency, but house prices are between 10 and 15 times average incomes.
  • There are about 10,000 second homes in the same district as the south lakes community with nearly full employment.
  • Scotland was promised £1.5 billion annually as part of Brexit but received 40% less funding than under EU programmes.
  • Scotland has experienced a 5.2% cut in its resource budget and a 9.7% cut in its capital budget.
  • The Scottish child payment initiative provides £20 per child per week.
  • Her Majesty’s Treasury publishes regional breakdowns of expenditure through PESA.
  • A spatial data unit has been established within the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities to drive forward data transformation.
  • £5.7 billion is being invested in Yorkshire transport improvements through city region sustainable transport settlements.
  • Poorer half of local authorities received 71% of UK Shared Prosperity Fund (SPF) and 74% of round 1 levelling-up funding.
  • Ian Paisley Jnr interrupts Alex Norris during a debate on the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill.
  • The discussion was initially about Great British Railways and its relevance to levelling up initiatives.
  • The quantum of funding has been drastically squeezed over the past decade-plus.
  • PESA is the Minister's favourite regional dataset.
  • There are more than three years-worth of reports from the Public Accounts Committee on various funds including the towns fund.
  • The Government's programme is criticized for failing to recognize its impact on organizations.
  • The Public Accounts Committee sees issues with the government programme.
  • The MP awaits the Government’s response and a potential debate.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy