<-- Back to proposed bills
Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill (Afternoon)
21 June 2022
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The statement discusses the role of Mayors in devolved governance models and the importance of tailored approaches for local communities. MPs discuss the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill, focusing on strengthened compulsory purchase order (CPO) powers and the creation of high street rental auctions. MPs discuss their ambition for further devolution and greater control over local budgets, particularly in areas like skills development, transport, and housing. MPs discuss the challenges of delivering affordable housing and regeneration projects under the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill. MPs are discussing the infrastructure levy proposed in the Bill and its potential benefits and challenges, particularly regarding valuation appraisals and disputes. The statement discusses concerns over the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill's approach to local leadership and community involvement. The statement discusses the effectiveness of the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill in improving health outcomes and community empowerment through local planning control and high street regeneration. The discussion centres around the quality and accountability of levelling-up missions in the Bill. The discussion focuses on the potential issues and opportunities of neighbourhood priority statements in the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill, particularly concerning deprived areas and community governance. The statement discusses the challenges and opportunities related to public transport infrastructure in Hartlepool, including the potential for a Tees Valley metro system. The statement discusses the Government's intentions to amend laws to ease the devolution of powers to two-tier governance areas through combined county authorities (CCAs) and征求更多关于地方当局可能希望联合行使的权力种类的信息。 The statement addresses concerns regarding the shortage of planning officers and the impact of proposed digitalisation initiatives on district councils' operations. The statement discusses the infrastructure levy and its potential impact on local planning authorities and developers. The statement discusses the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill, focusing on its aim to devolve power from central government to local authorities across various parts of the UK. MPs are discussing issues related to second home ownership, Airbnb properties, and local government leadership in the context of the Levelling-up Bill. The statement is about the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill, specifically discussing clause 1 which relates to community rights action.
Action Requested
No specific actions are proposed, but the statement highlights the need for flexibility in devolution arrangements to respect local democratic processes and preferences, emphasizing the success of the Mayor model in Greater Manchester and West Midlands while acknowledging that one size does not fit all.
Key Facts
- The Bill aims to increase public domestic research and development spending outside the greater south-east area by a third over the spending review period.
- Innovation Greater Manchester and Innovation West Midlands are organizations focused on driving innovation and economic prosperity in their respective regions.
- Laura Shoaf emphasizes that devolution must reflect democracy and accountability in each place.
- The Bill aims to strengthen CPO powers and create high street rental auctions.
- The model of having a Mayor has been in place since 2017, following the creation of the first combined authority in 2010.
- There is concern about local authorities' capacity to take advantage of new powers effectively.
- The Local Government Association recognised that 448 different grants were paid to councils in 2020.
- MPs are focused on skills development, transport, housing retrofit, digital inclusion, and the need for more stable funding frameworks.
- There is a desire for multi-year local authority funding settlement and sustainable funding for social infrastructure issues.
- Section 106 is less effective in northern parts of the country due to high remediation costs on brownfield sites.
- The brownfield land fund has helped unlock development but may not be sufficient for affordable housing provision.
- Ancoats regeneration project in Manchester took 15 years with initial public investment and subsequent private sector involvement.
- The infrastructure levy is welcomed as it is extracted once value has been created.
- There are concerns about delays in income from the levy affecting funding for initial infrastructure.
- Viability assessments being made public helps to bring transparency and clarity to value early on.
- The Levelling-up White Paper mentions £250 billion-worth of spend.
- Clauses 43 and 45 grant the Secretary of State new powers to impose governance changes unilaterally, with public consultation.
- Professor Atherton's research found over 120 different policy targets or policies mentioned in the White Paper.
- There is skepticism about the Bill's ability to achieve health outcomes similar to the significant investment in east Germany post-1990.
- Neighbourhood share allows 25% of the infrastructure levy to be controlled by parish councils or neighbourhood planning forums, but this applies predominantly in wealthy and rural areas.
- The Wharton Trust in Hartlepool is mentioned as an example of a community anchor organisation.
- The Institute of Economic Affairs has described the missions as being of “dubious quality”.
- Some missions are considered excellent while others are narrow, vague, or too easy to achieve.
- Political accountability through parliamentary reporting is welcomed but seen as insufficient without independent scrutiny.
- Neighbourhood priority statements allow communities to set out their priorities clearly.
- Community anchor organisations are more likely to be found in deprived areas.
- The Government’s pledge to bring forward community covenants is seen as a game changer.
- Sacha Bedding mentions that bus services stop running at 6 pm in Hartlepool.
- The Tees Valley metro system is proposed to connect areas currently taking an hour by car within 15 minutes.
- Public transport use in the north-east is significantly higher than other parts of the country due to low car ownership.
- The levelling-up framework sets out levels 1, 2, and 3 for devolved powers within nine vanguard areas.
- District councils are being more ambitious than county and unitary councils in some areas.
- Localities need opportunities to collaborate on strategic planning, housing challenges, inward investment, and business support.
- There is a shortage of planning officers due to higher salaries offered by the private sector.
- District councils need capital support in the Bill to upgrade software and hardware for digitalisation.
- The Bill aims to simplify the process of developing local plans, with currently only 39% of England covered by them.
- Welcomes the simplification of the community infrastructure levy.
- Developers often use viability as an excuse to increase profits.
- Developments of fewer than 10 houses do not pay anything under the current system.
- The Bill aims to enable every part of the country to have devolution, not just cities.
- Cllr Jamieson welcomes the ambition for everywhere to have a devolution deal.
- He stresses that devolution should be led by local leaders and not by restructuring from Whitehall.
- Local authorities have seen positive impacts from taxing second homes for council tax purposes.
- Airbnb properties can remove rental properties from the market, creating challenges related to antisocial behavior and fluid community dynamics.
- Landlords face regulatory changes which may impact their willingness to operate in certain markets.
- There is a concern about the high cost of housing affecting workforce availability in areas like Cornwall.
- The meeting is adjourned till Thursday 23 June at half-past Eleven o'clock.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy