<-- Back to proposed bills

Public Order Bill - Sitting 6

16 June 2022

Proposing MP
North West Hampshire
Type
Public Bill Committee

At a Glance

Issue Summary

The statement discusses the Public Order Bill's Clause 12, focusing on serious disruption prevention orders (SDPOs) to address repeated disruptive protesting. The statement discusses the Serious Disruption Prevention Orders (SDPOs) proposed in the Public Order Bill and their potential infringement on individuals' rights to protest. Kit Malthouse is addressing the Public Order Bill's Serious Disruption Prevention Orders (SDPOs), discussing how chief constables can apply for SDPOs to be imposed on individuals. Sarah Jones discusses concerns about clause 13 of the Public Order Bill, particularly regarding serious disruption prevention orders (SDPOs), which can be imposed on individuals who have not been convicted of a crime and whose actions may contribute to protest-related disruptions. Kit Malthouse is discussing the Public Order Bill and specifically Clause 13 which deals with serious disruption prevention orders. The statement discusses the provisions for serious disruption prevention orders (SDPOs) under clauses 14 to 16 of the Public Order Bill. Kit Malthouse discusses Clause 17 of the Public Order Bill, which outlines notification requirements for individuals subject to a Serious Disruption Prevention Order (SDPO). The statement discusses clauses in the Public Order Bill regarding serious disruption prevention orders (SDPOs), including their duration and potential offences. Kit Malthouse discusses the Public Order Bill's clause 20 which creates offences for individuals who fail to comply with Serious Disruption Prevention Orders (SDPO). The statement addresses the Public Order Bill's provisions regarding the renewal and variation of Serious Disruption Prevention Orders (SDPOs). The statement discusses the Public Order Bill's provisions for appeals against Strategic Defence Public Orders (SDPOs), guidance provided by the Home Secretary to chief officers of police, and parliamentary procedures for reviewing such guidance. Kit Malthouse is addressing amendments related to extending certain powers under the Public Order Act 1986 to the British Transport Police and Ministry of Defence police. Amendment 28 aims to place a duty on the Government to report to Parliament on the police's ability to meet their obligations under the Public Order Bill before its implementation. The MP discusses the potential negative impacts of the Public Order Bill on police resources and community relations, highlighting concerns over the number of officers needed for training and deployment. Kit Malthouse addresses the Public Order Bill, discussing amendments that he finds unnecessary due to existing police powers and resources. The statement is about amending the Public Order Act 1986 to include the British Transport Police Force and Ministry of Defence Police in certain provisions. The statement addresses amendments to the Public Order Bill to create offences related to tunnelling that cause serious disruption. Kit Malthouse is discussing the new tunnelling offence included in the Public Order Bill, aiming to prevent protesters from disrupting legitimate activities through tunneling.

Action Requested

Kit Malthouse requests that clause 12 stand part of the Bill and explains that SDPOs will prevent repeat offenders from causing serious disruption through conditions imposed by the judiciary. He clarifies misconceptions about SDPOs not banning protests outright but rather preventing criminal acts.

Key Facts

  • In 2021, approximately 170 Insulate Britain protesters were arrested about 980 times for obstructing motorways.
  • Each protester was arrested on average nearly six times over the period.
  • Clause 12 enables courts to impose SDPOs on individuals with a previous conviction for protest-related offences and who have participated in another protest within five years.
  • Anti-lockdown protesters were fined and banned from attending near Parliament and in Whitehall for 18 months.
  • This ban was imposed as part of their punishment for harassing a journalist outside Downing Street.
  • The police may make applications to the magistrates' court for an SDPO.
  • The conditions for making an SDPO on application are the same as those made on conviction.
  • Chief constables will be responsible for applying for SDPOs.
  • Clause 13 creates serious disruption prevention orders (SDPOs) for individuals who have not been convicted of a crime.
  • SDPO can be imposed if an individual has contributed to activities related to protests that result in serious disruption on two occasions.
  • Senior police officers and human rights organisations like Liberty and Amnesty International express concerns about the unworkability and ethical issues of SDPOs.
  • The clause aims to provide police with tools to deal with persistent offenders or those assisting in offending actions leading to serious disruption.
  • Some protesters have been arrested six times without responding to charges, indicating the need for new measures.
  • The Minister dismisses concerns about judicial complexity and public confidence issues.
  • Clause 14 provides non-exhaustive list of prohibitions and requirements in SDPOs.
  • The court must ensure that prohibitions and requirements do not prevent religious beliefs or access to work and education.
  • Clause 15 details supervision responsibilities for compliance with SDPO requirements.
  • Clause 16 allows courts to use electronic monitoring as a requirement for SDPO, lasting up to 12 months.
  • Individuals subject to an SDPO must notify their local police, in person, within three days of receiving the order.
  • If any information changes, individuals must notify the police within three days of the change.
  • Subsection (3) requires notification about any other premises at which the individual regularly resides or stays.
  • Subsection (4) specifies that if an individual decides to live for a period of one month or more elsewhere, they should provide notification.
  • Clause 18 sets the duration of an SDPO from one week to two years.
  • For electronic monitoring requirements under an SDPO, a maximum period of 12 months is allowed.
  • Under clause 20, fines for breaching an SDPO are currently unlimited and proposed to remain so as per judicial discretion.
  • Clause 20 establishes offences for failing to comply with SDPO requirements.
  • Individuals can face a summary conviction penalty of up to 6 months’ imprisonment or an unlimited fine.
  • The maximum term of imprisonment increases to 51 weeks if section 281(5) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 comes into force.
  • Clause 21 enables individuals subject to SDPOs or relevant police officers to apply for variation, renewal, or discharge of an SDPO.
  • When deciding on variations or renewals, courts must hear from both sides and consider whether the order will prevent protest-related offences or serious disruption.
  • Any changes to an SDPO are subject to the same duration limits as the original order—minimum one week, maximum two years—with electronic monitoring limited to 12 months.
  • Clause 22 provides routes of appeal against SDPOs.
  • The Home Secretary may issue non-binding guidance under clause 23.
  • Parliament has a 40-day period to adopt resolutions against guidance issued under clause 24.
  • New clause 4 closes a gap in existing powers by extending certain powers of part 2 of the Public Order Act 1986 to British Transport Police and Ministry of Defence Police.
  • The amendment ensures that these provisions come into force two months after Royal Assent.
  • The new clause includes limitations such as requiring senior officers to exercise the powers and ensuring they reasonably believe an assembly may result in serious disorder.
  • Amendment 28 is consequential on amendment 27.
  • Chief Constable Noble reported that Staffordshire Police has limited gold standard officers (two or three) with a dozen at bronze level.
  • Training for basic officer roles takes a few days each year, command officer training lasts a week, and specialist roles require two to three weeks of training.
  • Over 3,000 officers across England and Wales will need training in new laws.
  • Training these officers could lead to a loss of about 125 days of frontline policing.
  • Nearly 47,000 incidents of knife crime were reported in England and Wales in 2021.
  • The UK has 142,000 police officers currently.
  • The peak in 2010 was 144,000 with plans for recruitment that will put numbers above previous levels.
  • Police officers were drafted from Scotland to assist in the policing of protests.
  • The Public Order Act 1986 is being amended.
  • Subsections (2ZA) and (2ZB) include references to the British Transport Police Force and Ministry of Defence Police.
  • Sections 31(1)(a) to (f) of the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003 are mentioned as relevant locations for these amendments.
  • Section 2(2) of the Ministry of Defence Police Act 1987 is also included in the amendment.
  • The new clauses cover creation of tunnels causing serious disruption.
  • Offences include presence in a tunnel after the clause's implementation if it causes serious disruption.
  • Equipment for tunnelling is also made an offence if intended to facilitate criminal activity.
  • The new tunnelling offence aims to protect the public from serious disruption caused by protesters.
  • New clause 7 will make it illegal to go equipped for tunnelling, punishable by six months’ imprisonment or an unlimited fine.
  • Amendments 25 and 26 allow preventive action against those intending to tunnel.
  • NPCC lead Chris Noble stated that specific offences around tunnelling do not add value beyond current powers.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy