<-- Back to proposed bills
Online Safety Bill - Sitting 3
26 May 2022
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The statement discusses procedural changes to the Online Safety Bill's Committee schedule and introduces new witnesses for oral evidence. The speaker discusses concerns about the Online Safety Bill's impact on media regulation and Ofcom's independence. Maria Miller questions Full Fact about the Online Safety Bill's effectiveness in providing higher protection for children compared to adults. The statement discusses the importance of focusing on the drivers and mechanisms that lead to online harm rather than specific content types, emphasizing the need for a safety-by-design approach and greater transparency from tech companies. The discussion focuses on the Online Safety Bill's provisions for protecting individuals involved in elections and addressing harmful content directed at elected officials. The statement discusses concerns about the exemption for recognised news publishers under clause 50 of the Online Safety Bill and suggests improvements to address potential loopholes. The statement addresses questions and discussions regarding the Online Safety Bill, specifically focusing on clause 13(4) and its implications for regulating harmful content. The speaker discusses the inadequacies in the Online Safety Bill regarding small, high-harm platforms and calls for measures to address this issue. The speaker discusses concerns about search engines and voice assistants promoting harmful content and not addressing legal harms as required by the Online Safety Bill. Christina Rees is addressing questions related to the Online Safety Bill and its provisions on anonymous internet use and comment moderation. Christina Rees acknowledges a question from Navendu Mishra regarding whether the Online Safety Bill provides sufficient protection for groups suffering disproportionate abuse online due to protected characteristics. The statement addresses concerns about online platforms, particularly small but toxic ones like 4chan and BitChute, and their obligations under the Online Safety Bill. The statement discusses concerns regarding online abuse and misinformation and the importance of a digital media literacy strategy to address these issues. The statement is about the continuation of proceedings for the Online Safety Bill Sitting 3 in the Public Bill Committee.
Action Requested
The Government wishes to amend the programme order to replace The Football Association with Barnardo’s. No specific future actions are proposed beyond this amendment.
Key Facts
- The Government moved a motion to amend the programme order agreed by the Committee on Tuesday.
- Barnardo’s is replacing The Football Association in the schedule.
- Witnesses include Mat Ilic, William May, Professor Lorna Woods MBE and William Perrin OBE.
- The Government signed up to a recommendation by the Council of Ministers of the Council of Europe in April this year.
- Clause 40 gives the Secretary of State powers of direction over Ofcom's codes of practice.
- Clause 147 allows the Secretary of State to give tactical guidance to Ofcom, which goes against convention.
- Clause 146 grants unusual powers for the Secretary of State to direct companies without a particularly high threshold.
- Maria Miller opens a conversation about child protection within the Online Safety Bill.
- The key objective is ensuring higher protection for children than adults under the legislation.
- Questions focus on whether risks of harm to children should be set out explicitly in the Bill.
- The research shows social media catalyzes serious youth violence and child exploitation.
- The safety-by-design focus needs age-specific frameworks built into products designed for children.
- Search engines have no duty to regulate advertising content aimed at children.
- William Moy declares an interest in clause 15 due to Full Fact's exemption coverage.
- Clause 15 involves a news publisher content exemption which Full Fact finds awkward and not adequately addressing freedom of expression concerns.
- The Bill is described as a risk-management regime focusing on high-risk events and individuals, including election staff, candidates, and journalists.
- Clause 50 sets out exemptions for recognised news publishers.
- William Moy suggests using public benefit journalism criteria from recent Charity Commission decisions as useful criteria.
- The Leveson inquiry's criteria for self-regulation of media organisations are also mentioned as a potential source of useful criteria.
- Christina Rees introduces Danny Stone, Stephen Kinsella, and Liron Velleman for a panel discussion.
- The session is scheduled until 1 pm.
- The Community Security Trust's report “Hate Fuel” highlighted instances where legal but harmful material inspired real-world harm.
- Payton Gendron, responsible for the Buffalo shooting, cited /pol/ on 4chan as a source of motivation.
- Smaller platforms do not have the same regulatory burden as larger services under the Bill.
- Search services are currently not required to address legal harms under the Bill.
- Microsoft Bing was prompting users with harmful content such as "Jews are" followed by a rude word.
- Alexa responded affirmatively when asked if George Soros is evil, based on information from an anonymous contributor.
- The Bill currently has a limited reference to anonymity.
- There is concern about verifying users' identities without compromising their data privacy.
- Polling indicates that at least two-thirds of citizens are willing to be verified if it means screening out unverified accounts.
- Third-party verification systems, such as One ID and open banking principles, could provide a solution for user identity verification.
- The Online Safety Bill lists priority illegal harms.
- Danny Stone recommends referencing the Equality Act in the Bill for additional clarity on protected characteristics.
- Navendu Mishra asks if the Bill sufficiently protects groups suffering disproportionate abuse online.
- The Online Safety Bill aims to regulate harmful content on platforms.
- Clauses 15 and 16 require operators to consider content of democratic importance and journalistic value proportionately.
- Platforms like BitChute are discussed in relation to their obligations under the Bill.
- UCL data shows that 68% of nearly 8,000 students were unfamiliar with the term 'antisemitism'.
- The panel discusses the importance of verification to build trust online.
- Media literacy is crucial for both children and adults, especially in light of harmful content proliferation on community platforms during the pandemic.
- The session was ordered to be adjourned at Two o'clock on the same day.
- Steve Double is mentioned as initiating the order for adjournment.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy