<-- Back to proposed bills
Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - Sitting 7
22 June 2023
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The statement addresses the introduction of pro-competition interventions (PCIs) for digital markets through the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill. The statement discusses consumer protections, competition problems, and the role of the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill. Philip Hollobone is addressing concerns about the Digital Markets Unit's (DMU) powers and how they will be scrutinised, particularly in relation to pro-competition interventions (PCIs). MP Philip Hollobone is discussing the standing part of various clauses and schedules in the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill. The statement discusses the requirement for Significant Market Status (SMS) firms to report potential mergers that could harm competition in the UK before completion. MP Philip Hollobone is discussing clauses related to reporting duties and information requirements for mergers involving designated undertakings in the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill. The statement discusses amendments to limit the Digital Markets Unit's (DMU) power of access and ensure it applies only to business premises. MP Philip Hollobone is discussing clauses 70 to 76 of the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill. The MPs are discussing clauses related to the Digital Markets Unit's (DMU) information-gathering and entry powers under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill. The statement discusses clauses 77 to 80 of the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill, addressing the Investigatory Powers of the Digital Markets Unit (DMU). Seema Malhotra discusses clauses in the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill concerning the CMA's investigatory powers and evidence preservation.
Action Requested
The government proposes to empower the Digital Markets Unit (DMU) to conduct PCI investigations into suspected competition problems related to designated digital activities, issue pro-competition orders, and monitor their effectiveness. The process includes public consultations and iterative measures to address market power issues effectively.
Key Facts
- Government amendment 12 is a technical amendment relating to PCI investigations.
- Clause 45 empowers the DMU to open PCI investigations into suspected competition problems.
- The DMU must conduct a public consultation before concluding an investigation and giving notice of final decisions under clause 47.
- Pro-competition orders can be imposed on a trial basis and replaced with stronger measures if necessary under clauses 49 and 50.
- SMS firms may offer commitments to the DMU for proposing solutions to competition problems.
- Clause 44 enables the CMA to make Pro-Competitive Interventions (PCIs).
- There is no defined list of PCI remedies in the Bill.
- Clause 45 outlines the legal powers for formal investigations by the CMA.
- Clause 46 ensures the CMA will publish a summary of the PCI notice as soon as possible.
- Clause 48(7) states that the CMA must publish copies of notices 'as soon as reasonably practicable.'
- The DMU is tasked with promoting competition for the benefit of consumers.
- PCI notices can be introduced after public consultation and may not require a four-month timeline if minimal consultation is needed due to obviousness.
- Examples of potential PCIs include choice remedies, interoperability measures, data portability, and separation remedies.
- Clauses 56 to 59 are discussed for standing part.
- Schedule 2 is proposed as the Second schedule to the Bill.
- Clauses 60 to 66 are also discussed for standing part.
- SMS firms must report mergers that could harm competition before completion.
- Three conditions trigger the reporting requirement: holding shares or voting rights in a UK-connected body corporate, with consideration of at least £25 million.
- The CMA has up to five working days to determine if a report is sufficient and another five for review.
- Clause 67 deals with the power to require information.
- Clause 68 is discussed in conjunction with clause 67.
- No specific action or changes proposed, just a request for these clauses to stand part of the bill.
- Clause 69 allows the DMU to require firm-led tests or demonstrations under its supervision.
- Government amendments 13 and 16 limit the DMU’s power of access to business premises only.
- Amendments aim to ensure that powers are proportionate and appropriately constrained.
- Government amendments 13, 14, 15, and 24 aim to clarify and limit the CMA's access rights to individuals and business premises within the United Kingdom.
- Amendment 16 moves the definition of 'business premises' from clause 72 to clause 69.
- The amendments are intended to ensure consistency across the DMU’s information-gathering toolkit.
- Clause 69 enables firm-led tests and demonstrations by the DMU.
- Clause 70 allows the DMU to require interviews with individuals holding relevant information.
- Clause 71 protects interviewees from self-incrimination in criminal prosecutions.
- Clause 72 permits warrantless entry for breach investigations under certain conditions.
- Clause 73 allows entry after obtaining a High Court or Competition Appeal Tribunal warrant, subject to reasonable suspicion of relevant information on premises.
- Clause 74 specifies supplementary requirements and clarifies extraterritorial scope.
- Clause 75 permits taking copies of information during warrant-based investigations.
- Clause 76 mandates adherence to judicial procedures for obtaining warrants.
- Clauses 77 to 80 introduce final elements supporting the DMU’s investigatory powers.
- Clause 77 gives the DMU power to authorise skilled persons for reports on technical information gathered during investigations.
- Clause 79 prevents the DMU from requiring information subject to legal professional privilege or confidentiality in Scotland.
- Seema Malhotra speaks on behalf of her hon. Friend in another debate.
- Clause 77 gives the CMA power to appoint skilled persons for reports and imposes obligations on designated undertakings to assist these persons.
- Clause 78 places a duty on relevant entities to preserve evidence before and after formal requests by the CMA, with penalties for non-compliance.
- Clause 79 specifies that the CMA cannot require information subject to legal and professional privilege.
- Clause 80 allows the CMA to publish notices of decisions to use investigatory powers under the digital markets regime for international investigations.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy