<-- Back to proposed bills

Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - Sitting 2

13 June 2023

Proposing MP
Bethnal Green and Stepney
Type
Public Bill Committee

At a Glance

Issue Summary

The statement discusses the Digital Markets Bill and its impact on innovation in digital markets. The statement discusses the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill, focusing on its impact on innovation and competition. The statement discusses the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill and its approach to regulating large digital platforms. The statement discusses how the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill could impact small businesses and large tech companies in the UK. The statement addresses the issue of political accountability and judicial review in the context of the Digital Markets Bill's appeal process. Rushanara Ali is summarizing and transitioning between witness panels during a parliamentary hearing on the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill. The statement discusses the impact of unwanted subscription services on UK households and proposes legislative changes to address consumer detriment. The statement discusses the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill's ability to hold online retailers responsible for safety standards and consumer protection. The statement discusses the need for addressing omissions in Schedule 18 of the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill regarding unfair commercial practices such as drip pricing and misleading green advertising. The discussion focuses on the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill, specifically addressing issues related to fake reviews, subscription traps, and market differences in Scotland. Rushanara Ali is leading a discussion on the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill, focusing on its implications for consumers and competition in digital markets. Professor Myers discusses the Digital Markets Bill's impact on innovation by large tech companies and the importance of regulatory flexibility. Rushanara Ali concludes a session of oral evidence regarding the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill and introduces Graham Wynn from the British Retail Consortium. The speaker discusses concerns about the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill, focusing on issues like enforcement resources, fake reviews, and trading standards. Max von Thun discusses the importance of not watering down the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill as it moves through Parliament. Max von Thun discusses issues related to data collection, self-preferencing, and interoperability restrictions in digital markets. The statement is about welcoming the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill and discussing potential gaps in its implementation that could benefit from a stronger role for trading standards officers. John Herriman and David MacKenzie discuss the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill, highlighting both its strengths in providing clearer legislation and changes to CPRs but also areas needing improvement such as trading standards' capacity and officers’ powers. Rushanara Ali introduces witnesses from the news media industry to provide evidence on the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill. The statement discusses the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill and its importance in addressing the imbalance of power between news publishers and tech platforms. The statement discusses the impact of proposed changes in the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill on digital markets, particularly focusing on Amazon's market power in book sales and the need for regulation to prevent anti-competitive outcomes.

Action Requested

No specific action requested, but the witnesses support the pro-innovation approach of the Bill, which aims to unlock opportunities for smaller firms while not hindering larger platforms from innovating. They emphasize the need for speed and flexibility in regulating the fast-paced digital sector.

Key Facts

  • Professor Amelia Fletcher is a non-executive director at the Competition and Markets Authority.
  • The Furman review was initiated by Jason Furman, who chaired the expert panel on digital competition.
  • Philip Marsden serves as deputy chair for enforcement at the Bank of England.
  • The Digital Markets Unit would enforce existing anti-trust measures more explicitly and quickly.
  • Interoperability, data portability, and data access are considered intrusive interventions but necessary for a proper innovative environment.
  • The legislation is designed to be targeted at barriers to innovation identified by experts.
  • The UK is leading in proposing bespoke, nuanced legislation to address competitive structure problems.
  • Open banking served as a natural experiment demonstrating the potential impact of pro-competitive rules on large platforms.
  • Other jurisdictions are looking at and implementing similar measures due to political trends around the world.
  • Professor Fletcher discusses the EU regulation approach which includes quantitative thresholds.
  • The bespoke and evidence-based UK approach is highlighted.
  • There is a concern about losing administrability and enforceability if tiny changes are made to legislation.
  • Professor Furman supports having a body that approaches decisions transparently and predictably.
  • In the US, Congress would oversee regulatory bodies at a strategic level rather than on individual cases.
  • Professor Fletcher agrees with concerns about discretion but notes the CMA's serious approach to its responsibilities.
  • Rushanara Ali welcomes Noyona Chundur, Peter Eisenegger, and Tracey Reilly as witnesses.
  • Seema Malhotra asks Ms Chundur about the adequacy of the Bill in addressing consumer detriment in digital markets.
  • The Consumer Council has dealt with over 33,000 consumers showing complex needs related to vulnerability.
  • The Government's research estimates that 81% of UK households signed up to at least one subscription last year.
  • Consumers are spending £1.6 billion per year on subscriptions they do not want.
  • One consumer reported taking six months to cancel a trial subscription.
  • The Bill aims to address incomplete or inaccurate information presented to consumers.
  • Electrical Safety First is concerned about online retailers' responsibility for product safety.
  • Class actions such as those against Mastercard and Amazon serve as current enforcement measures.
  • Consumer expectations include protection from fraud, mis-selling, and damage during installation in new digital markets.
  • Schedule 18 omits arguably unfair commercial practices like drip pricing and misleading green advertising.
  • The Bill includes a power for the Secretary of State to amend the schedule by regulation with safeguards in place.
  • Existing regulators have powers to tackle issues such as greenwashing, but more work is needed on consumer trust during the net zero transition.
  • £1.6 billion per year is spent on unwanted subscriptions.
  • AI technology complicates the identification and regulation of fake reviews.
  • There are differences in market operations between England and Scotland that need consideration.
  • The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill aims to regulate digital markets.
  • There is a focus on ensuring that the bill addresses regional differences in the UK.
  • A communications campaign is fundamental to informing consumers about their new rights under the bill.
  • The Bill aims to balance flexibility with future-proofing.
  • It sets out regulatory objectives without being overly prescriptive compared to other jurisdictions like the EU's Digital Markets Act.
  • Implementation may take until at least 2025, but the CMA is prepared and resourceful.
  • Rushanara Ali concludes a session of oral evidence.
  • Graham Wynn introduces himself as assistant director for consumer competition and regulatory affairs at the British Retail Consortium.
  • Seema Malhotra asks about main consumer issues in the retail industry that the Bill should address.
  • Trading standards resources have dropped by 50% over the years.
  • The Bill's focus on the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) may further reduce trading standards' visibility.
  • There are concerns about fake reviews not being banned explicitly in the Bill.
  • Max von Thun is Europe director at Open Markets Institute, a competition policy think-tank.
  • The legislation currently stands as very strong according to Open Markets Institute recommendations.
  • Campaigning from larger platforms has targeted the review standard and countervailing benefits exemption.
  • The Bill targets only a few dominant firms.
  • Conduct requirements aim to stamp out anti-competitive practices.
  • PCIs allow for interoperability and data opening to inject competition into the market.
  • John Herriman is the chief executive of the Chartered Trading Standards Institute.
  • David MacKenzie works for Highland Council on trading standards and has a role with CTSI across the UK.
  • The speaker welcomes the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill.
  • Trading standards has been hit by about 50% cuts over the last decade.
  • Regulatory services have faced about 25% cuts according to the latest National Audit Office report.
  • The Bill introduces a range of potential punitive sanctions that can be imposed on businesses.
  • Owen Meredith is CEO of the News Media Association representing local, regional, and national news media.
  • Peter Wright is editor emeritus of DMG Media, a major British and international news publisher.
  • Dan Conway is CEO of the Publishers Association representing publishers of books, journals, and educational materials.
  • The imbalance between news publishers and platforms is self-evident, with over 70% of local market consumers and over 80% of national market consumers reading news online.
  • There are concerns about the final offer mechanism being overly complex, specifically stage 8 which involves information sharing.
  • Tech companies may use lobbying as a delaying tactic to challenge every decision by the Digital Markets Unit in court.
  • Dan Conway believes Amazon should be assigned strategic market status due to its dominant position in book sales.
  • Amazon sells over 50% of print books and about 90% of e-books and audiobooks in the UK market, indicating significant market power.
  • Publishers face 'take it or leave it' terms when negotiating with Amazon.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy