<-- Back to proposed bills
Lifelong Learning (Higher Education Fee Limits) Bill - Sitting 2
21 March 2023
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The discussion revolves around the Lifelong Learning Entitlement (LLE) Bill and its potential impact on employers and further education providers. The discussion focuses on the potential impacts of economic pressures on employer-funded training, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and explores the role of lifelong learning in improving individual productivity and navigating career paths. The statement discusses challenges businesses face in accessing training courses due to labour shortages and budget constraints. Robert Syms concludes a brief session discussing the Lifelong Learning Entitlement and its potential impact on employer engagement in training. The statement discusses the Lifelong Learning (Higher Education Fee Limits) Bill and its provisions for modular courses and fee limits. The statement discusses the potential impact of the Lifelong Learning Entitlement (LLE) on Further Education (FE) institutions and universities, focusing on course availability and institutional engagement. The speaker discusses the potential of the Lifelong Learning Entitlement (LLE) to increase access to higher education for those who have not traditionally pursued it and emphasizes the need for collaboration between further education colleges and universities. The discussion focuses on the Lifelong Learning Fee Limits Bill and its potential impacts on higher education institutions, particularly regarding credit-based fee limits and registration of new providers. The discussion focuses on the Lifelong Learning Entitlement Bill and its implications for higher education institutions. The discussion revolves around the concerns and challenges associated with the introduction of the Lifelong Learning Entitlement (LLE) programme. The discussion focuses on the feasibility and challenges of modularising degrees under the Lifelong Learning Entitlement (LLE) system. The statement discusses the coordination and recognition of lifelong learning credits and modules across different institutions, highlighting the challenges and potential solutions for student guidance and protection.
Action Requested
There is no specific action requested in this statement. The conversation focuses on understanding how employers will respond to the LLE and discussing the implications for further education providers who deliver advanced learner loan provision.
Key Facts
- Matthew Percival from the CBI discusses the need for employer, state, and individual investment in skills.
- Only 20% of businesses were aware of the LLE when surveyed last year.
- Simon Ashworth highlights that the Bill introduces a third pathway for regulation through the Office for Students.
- Employers are facing pressure to support employees' basic pay settlements, leading some to cut discretionary costs such as training budgets.
- The survey indicates that more businesses intend to increase their spend on training than decrease it, although the balance is weaker compared to previous years.
- There is a concern about training workers without considering changes to jobs themselves, which could limit overall productivity gains.
- There are job-to-job moves within the labour market due to salary pressures.
- Providers face workforce challenges when delivering training in a shortage environment.
- Large employers have more influence on course development compared to SMEs.
- The session involves discussion around the Lifelong Learning Entitlement and its implications.
- Employers may adjust their current training practices as a result of the new entitlement programme.
- The debate touches on issues such as employer engagement, skills shortages, and fiscal advantages for SMEs.
- Sir Philip Augar chaired the post-18 panel between 2018 and 2019.
- The Bill is a technical document with three clauses focused on setting fair pricing for modules.
- The personal lifelong loan entitlement has an envelope of £37,000.
- The unit of resource should remain frozen until 2025 according to the panel's recommendation.
- Sir Philip Augar sees a significant opportunity for independent providers and FE colleges through the LLE.
- Universities may be less inclined to offer modularised, credit-based lifelong learning due to current demand from domestic and overseas students for full three-year degrees.
- The statement highlights the importance of overcoming perceptions that academic routes are superior to vocational ones.
- 10% of the adult population have levels 4 and 5 qualifications.
- There are examples of effective collaboration between HEIs like Nottingham Trent University and colleges such as West Nottinghamshire College.
- Investment in adult education has decreased over the past 12 years, and funding rates for colleges have not changed in a decade.
- The Lifelong Learning Fee Limits Bill uses credits as a basis for fee limits.
- Most universities use credits except Oxford, Cambridge and medical schools.
- There is concern about unintended consequences for students who fail or resit courses.
- A new category of registration will be introduced by the OfS for providers offering only modular provision.
- Professor Rigby identifies multiple start dates for university courses under the Bill's proposed changes.
- The legislation will impact approximately two million existing students.
- Universities are concerned about the Secretary of State's power to remove module funding.
- Coventry University is an early adopter of modularised learning.
- The cost of regulation to one university over the last year has been in excess of half a million pounds.
- Breaking down each degree into 12 pieces can amplify administrative burden by 80 times 12.
- Modularising degrees allows for flexibility in learning.
- Core modules can remain static while optional modules evolve.
- Rapidly evolving fields like computing pose challenges for modularisation.
- The LLE system could allow individuals to pursue education flexibly throughout their careers.
- Professor Rigby discussed the case-by-case basis for credit recognition by universities.
- Dr Norton mentioned the need for a review of student protection directions under the Office for Students (OfS).
- The Committee is scheduled to meet again on Thursday, March 23 at 11:30 am.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy