<-- Back to proposed bills

Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill - Sitting 1

24 April 2024

Proposing MP
Mid Derbyshire
Type
Public Bill Committee

At a Glance

Issue Summary

Pauline Latham is addressing the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill and proposing an amendment to Clause 1 regarding the scope and consequences of offences involving livestock worrying. The statement discusses amendments to the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act 1953 to address concerns about livestock worrying by dogs. The statement discusses the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill, which aims to address issues related to dog attacks on livestock. The MP discusses the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill, highlighting concerns about inconsistencies between existing legislation and proposing changes to enhance enforcement and penalties. MP Kit Malthouse discusses amendments to the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill. The speaker discusses the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill and compares it to the previously discussed kept animals Bill. The statement discusses the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill which aims to amend the existing Act to strengthen police powers in dealing with livestock worrying and attacks by dogs. The statement discusses the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill and addresses concerns raised by MPs regarding disqualification from dog ownership for those who commit offences under the 1953 Act.

Action Requested

Latham proposes amending the existing law to increase penalties for repeat offenders, specifically changing the fine levels based on previous convictions. She also indicates that Clauses 2 to 5 should stand part as is without further discussion or amendment.

Key Facts

  • Clause 1 addresses livestock worrying offences.
  • Amendment 1 proposes increasing fines for those previously convicted under this Act with the same dog.
  • The schedule includes amendments related to conviction penalties.
  • Clause 1 brings camelids under the definition of 'livestock'.
  • Clause 1 extends the scope to incidents on roads and paths.
  • Clause 2 updates seizure procedures for police.
  • Clause 3 ensures evidence collection methods are up-to-date, including dental impressions.
  • Clause 4 grants powers of entry and search via application to a justice of the peace.
  • Clause 5 covers extent, commencement, transitional provisions, and short title.
  • The Act aims to come into force at the end of three months.
  • The Bill addresses concerns of many constituents affected by dog attacks on livestock.
  • Enhanced investigatory powers for the police are included in the amendments to the 1953 Act.
  • Increased penalties for those found allowing their dogs to attack livestock.
  • The Bill amends the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act 1953.
  • Section 3 of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 makes it an offence to own a dangerously out-of-control dog causing serious injury.
  • Current penalties for livestock attacks under the Bill are considered too lenient with a maximum fine of £1,000.
  • Kit Malthouse represents Hampshire downland with significant sheep population.
  • The MP mentions a case of Fenton chasing deer across Richmond Park resulting in prosecution.
  • There is currently a seven-day limit for detaining dogs by the police.
  • Ostriches are considered part of the UK’s agricultural mix.
  • A 'three strikes and you're out' rule is proposed for repeat offenders.
  • The kept animals Bill was discussed two and a half years ago.
  • The kept animals Bill introduced control orders and disqualification orders.
  • The 1953 Act is being amended rather than replaced by the current Bill.
  • Statistics show UK farm animals worth £2.4 million were severely injured or killed by dogs in 2023.
  • A survey found that 70% of farmers had experienced sheep worrying incidents in the past year.
  • The Bill will extend species protection to include camelids and amend terminology for attacking livestock.
  • Disqualification from dog ownership is not currently covered by the Bill.
  • Courts can impose unlimited fines through sentencing guidelines but do not distribute fine money to farmers for compensation.
  • The Animal Welfare Act considers animal welfare, which is devolved, complicating disqualification issues.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy