<-- Back to proposed bills

Criminal Justice Bill - Sitting 13

25 January 2024

Proposing MP
Wallasey
Type
Public Bill Committee

At a Glance

Issue Summary

The statement discusses an amendment to Clause 73 of the Criminal Justice Bill, which aims to include specific actions and behaviours that will be considered ethical policing in the College of Policing’s code. Angela Eagle is discussing amendments to clause 73 of the Criminal Justice Bill aimed at improving ethical policing and duty of candour. Angela Eagle discusses the Criminal Justice Bill and proposes amendments to address issues related to police-perpetrated abuse and accountability for investigating sexual violence crimes. The statement discusses the Criminal Justice Bill's clause 73 and its requirements for ethical policing and duty of candour, addressing concerns raised by amendments 63 and 149. The statement addresses the issue of vetting and data washing for police officers who have allegations of domestic abuse, even if there are no convictions. The statement discusses the College of Policing's codes of practice for managing relationships between police officers and members of the public, addressing concerns raised in amendments related to professional boundaries and power imbalances. Angela Eagle is discussing new clauses related to automatic dismissal and suspension for police officers involved in serious criminal offences or charges. The statement discusses new clauses proposed in the Criminal Justice Bill regarding police officers' vetting, duty to hand over personal mobile phones, recordable complaints of domestic abuse, and withdrawal of warrant cards for allegations of violence against women and girls. The statement discusses amendments aimed at improving police vetting processes and handling of domestic abuse cases involving police officers. Angela Eagle discusses new vetting arrangements for police officers to enhance safety and security, particularly in cases involving violence against women and girls.

Action Requested

Alex Norris proposes amending Clause 73 by adding a new subsection (2A) that requires the Code to explicitly define how police officers should embody and demonstrate ethical behaviour. This amendment would ensure clarity on what constitutes 'acting ethically' for police officers.

Key Facts

  • Amendment 63 is proposed in clause 73, page 64, line 36.
  • The amendment aims to add a new subsection (2A) to the clause.
  • The College of Policing’s code would be required to set out actions and behaviours considered ethical.
  • Amendment 135 aims to prohibit sexual relationships and abusive conduct by police officers.
  • Amendment 149 enhances the duty of candour, requiring disclosure of relevant information in major incident investigations.
  • New clause 48 requires diligent consideration of all intelligence related to a suspect.
  • Amendment 135 aims to clarify that domestic abuse committed by a police officer is contrary to professional standards.
  • The Independent Office for Police Conduct's guidance permits off-duty conduct as part of an officer’s private life, which does not constitute a breach of ethics or professional behaviour unless it discredits the service.
  • Jackie, a victim of her husband's domestic abuse, felt unable to continue working after reporting it and was treated differently from her perpetrator who continued his career.
  • New clause 48 is based on the Gaia principle, named after Gaia Pope-Sutherland, advocating for proper investigation of VAWG cases with due diligence.
  • Research indicates that a small number of prolific offenders are responsible for a disproportionate amount of crimes related to VAWG.
  • Clause 73 places a duty on the College of Policing to issue a code of practice relating to ethical policing.
  • The statutory code of practice was published on December 6th and includes provisions for ethical behavior, openness, and candor.
  • A data washing exercise rechecked 307,000 police officers against the police national database, resulting in 461 cases of concern, with nine referred for criminal investigation.
  • Ongoing vetting checks against the police national database are funded by the Government.
  • 88 cases out of 461 have been triaged for disciplinary investigation due to credible allegations.
  • The College of Policing published a code of practice in July last year outlining ongoing vetting requirements.
  • The codes of practice address professional boundaries and power imbalances between police officers and the public.
  • Amendment 135 specifically references managing relationships within policing.
  • Specialist agencies mentioned in amendment 136 include the Domestic Abuse Commissioner, Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses, and Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner.
  • The codes of practice were published under section 39A of the Police Act 1996.
  • New clause 6 amends Section 50 of the Police Act 1996 to provide for automatic dismissal of police officers upon conviction for a serious criminal offence.
  • New clause 7 introduces provisions for automatic suspension of officers charged with indictable-only or either-way offences, initially suspending them without disciplinary proceedings for up to 30 days.
  • The proposed amendments aim to enhance the vetting process and accountability within the police force.
  • New clause 8 amends section 39A of the Police Act 1996 to allow for automatic dismissal of officers who fail vetting.
  • New clause 9 amends section 50 of the Police Act 1996, providing regulations that may require police officers to hand over personal mobile phones if there is reasonable suspicion of gross misconduct.
  • New clause 34 amends section 29(4)(a) of the Police Reform Act 2002, ensuring police officers and staff have the right to make complaints of domestic abuse against their colleagues.
  • Bureau of Investigative Journalism found that forces do not collect data on non-molestation orders for police officers.
  • Nearly 45% of victims of police-perpetrated domestic abuse are themselves police officers or staff.
  • Section 29(4) of the Police Reform Act prevents police officers and staff from making complaints against their own force members.
  • New clause 35 proposes re-vetting every five years.
  • Officers who fail vetting due to serious violent or sexual offences would be dismissed.
  • New clause 36 suggests removing warrant cards from officers under investigation for crimes related to violence against women and girls.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy