The hon. Lady is absolutely right that the situation is completely unacceptable. I offer my support to her and her constituents in any way that I can. When I met representatives from Capita last week, they said that they want to under-promise and over-deliver. Clearly Capita has failed badly at that, but it has until the end of June to ensure that its services are delivered at an acceptable level. If it fails at that, we will use all options available. We are holding it robustly to account. Capita initially promised that all death in service and ill health cases were resolved, but that is not the case, and I am happy to take up the cases the hon. Lady mentions.

I wonder where the hon. Member for Clacton (Nigel Farage) is? [Interruption.] Not in Clacton, I am told, Mr Speaker. I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Kensington and Bayswater (Joe Powell) for his question, and his continued support for the Government's efforts to improve ethics and integrity in public life. The House knows that trust in politics is important, and that we have more work to do. That is why we have important rules about conflicts of interest, and why we must declare those conflicts of interest on the record, and then not lobby on behalf of donors or others who have sought to put money into our campaigns or other personal interests. The leader of Reform UK has said, “it's literally none of your business” in answer to questions about the £5 million crypto-donation. I am afraid that it is in the interests of the public, and he needs to answer questions about it. If he is acting on behalf of donors and asking questions in return for money, there should be consequences.

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his kind comments. He says that this might be our last time together at the Dispatch Box; I do not know where he is planning on going, but I hope to be back here in due course. He asks a very pertinent question. I know that any Prime Minister takes their responsibilities to the House seriously, and I am sure that the next Prime Minister will be at the Dispatch Box at the earliest opportunity.

I understand the premise of the hon. Gentleman's question, and I am sure the new Prime Minister will agree with the sentiment. We are waiting for confirmation of the timetable for the Labour party's election of a new leader. The sitting dates of this House have already been confirmed, but I know the new Prime Minister will want to come to the Dispatch Box at the earliest opportunity.

of course I would be happy to meet my hon. Friend to discuss that matter. We will be launching the national school of government, which will ensure that we have a civil service fit for purpose, not only for the current challenges but for the challenges of the future.

I thank the hon. Lady for taking the opportunity to pursue further Liberal Democrat policies; she is quite right to do so. She will know of the constitutional principles that mean we cannot bind our successors. I am sure that whoever is in the relevant ministerial role will happily answer that question in due course.

The Barnett formula plays an important role in ensuring fairness across all UK nations. However, the Scottish Government must spend funds effectively; they have failed to do so under SNP leadership.

Public appointments should be made through independent panels. Reforms continue to ensure that the best candidates lead without political conflicts.

Digital ID debates involve independent experts and advocates. Recommendations received from 120 citizens are being considered to ensure a free-to-use and freedom-of-choice system.

My hon. Friend's advocacy has been heard clearly.

The House notes the conclusion of the criminal investigation. Establishing an inquiry requires meeting certain conditions, which we are willing to review.

We track evolving threats from hostile foreign actors and provide advice to help businesses, communities, and individuals deal with them.

The investigations are ongoing; parallel reviews are happening in the European Parliament. Updates will be provided to my successor.

There are four sectors where we are using national security guidance, but the support for SMEs is much broader. I will happily talk to my hon. Friend and come back to her on particular parts of her constituency, but this plan will be nationwide, supporting all parts of the country, with more than £7 billion of Government money going to SMEs.

I assure the House that, given the Department I was in previously, I am able to join up the “food security is national security” mantra in a stronger way than has perhaps happened. The Government's land use framework demonstrates how we can ensure through multiple land use that we can build the homes we need and grow the food we need.

I am proud to have delivered the new security and defence partnership and the re-accession to Erasmus+. We are working on a summit that will be good for jobs, bear down on bills and secure our borders.

The Government's preparations for digital ID will ensure that all existing routes for accessing public services will remain in place. The preparation for digital ID, which will make digital access to public services easier, as I described earlier, will be built with the highest trusted status and will be road-tested by the public.

There are a number of areas where additional work with the European Union will be in our national interest. One of the great advantages of having annual UK-EU summits is that precisely those issues can be brought up.

The right hon. Gentleman is entirely right about that. I think we all know the value of public inquiries and the moment of public justice that they give. What we need to be very careful about is, first, how much they cost and, secondly, the time they take, so that when recommendations do come, they are timely.

SMEs, individuals and communities should look at the national advice that is published and check on gov.uk/protect, so that they can take the advice. It is simple and it is up there.

We are taking a number of steps to improve SME access to Government procurement, and I outlined those earlier. If it is okay with the hon. Gentleman, I will write to him about the specific measures we are taking in Northern Ireland.

We are working closely with the devolved Governments through bilateral meetings and regular official engagement. Digital ID will be free to use, and there will be freedom to choose.

My hon. Friend is absolutely right: it is crucial that we learn how well some of the innovations in our health tech have lent themselves to the process of implementing digital access to services. We are open-minded and will have further conversations.

We always assess security risks on a case-by-case basis, and we do not discuss what they are in public.

I absolutely do. We announced last week our intention to bring all Government Property Agency, catering and security services back in-house. It remains a priority for the Government.

Yes, I have. It remains a priority for the Government to work with our colleagues on this issue.

We have established a Cabinet Sub-Committee chaired by the Prime Minister and I chair senior ministerial groups to ensure we understand the impact of the conflict on the UK economy. This work informs government decisions to protect British citizens and the UK economy.

My hon. Friend has raised this with me, and we are looking at it. We have started with four sectors and want to go further.