Passenger Rail Services 2026-03-26

2026-03-26

TAGS
Response quality

Questions & Answers

Q1 Direct Answer
Bell Ribeiro-Addy Lab
Clapham and Brixton Hill
Context
Rail services have been unreliable, leading to cancellations. The government aims to improve these issues through public ownership of railway services.
What steps she is taking to improve passenger rail services after they were unreliable under the previous Government?
To improve unreliable services, this Government are bringing services into public ownership and creating Great British Railways. This generational reform is already improving passengers' experience of rail services, as cancellations are starting to fall after years of decline.
Assessment & feedback
Response accuracy
Q2 Partial Answer
Bell Ribeiro-Addy Lab
Clapham and Brixton Hill
Context
Inter-city rail fares in England are high compared to flying alternatives, making them unaffordable for many people. The Railways Bill promises powers to regulate fares.
Inter-city rail fares remain eye-watering with London to Birmingham costing £72 on the day and other routes similarly expensive. How will 'reasonable' criteria be defined and enforced in the Railways Bill?
Operational questions relating to how GBR designates fares will be a matter to consider once it has been created, but passenger affordability is a top priority for the Government. This year, we have frozen regulated rail fares for the first time in 30 years; without this decision, regulated rail fares would have increased by 5.8%.
Assessment & feedback
Details on how 'reasonable' criteria will be defined and enforced
Response accuracy
Q3 Partial Answer
Context
Events in Fylde rely on Sunday rail services which are often cancelled due to lack of staff. The railway is important for economic growth and cultural connection.
Would the Minister be willing to meet me and representatives from Fylde to discuss how we can get extra and more reliable Sunday services to support our important tourism industry?
The hon. Member is correct to point out that rail services can serve as a catalyst for economic growth and connect more people to cultural offerings. I will ensure his request for a meeting with the Minister for Rail and representatives from his local council is passed on.
Assessment & feedback
Details about improving Sunday service reliability
Passed The Meeting Request Forward
Response accuracy
Q4 Partial Answer
Steve Witherden Lab
Montgomeryshire and Glyndŵr
Context
Ruabon station progress in Access for All programme but northbound platform is not accessible to everyone. There is a need for ramp installation.
Will the Minister provide an update on progress in delivering a ramp at Ruabon station to make it more accessible?
My hon. Friend is right in his ambition for accessibility across our United Kingdom, including Wrexham. I will ensure that the Rail Minister provides him with an update in writing on when the ramp is likely to be delivered.
Assessment & feedback
Specific timeline or action plan
Response accuracy
Q5 Partial Answer
Martin Vickers Con
Brigg and Immingham
Context
The hon. Member is pleading with Ministers for a train service to Grimsby, an open access application from Grand Central Rail exists but LNER's state ownership hasn't resolved the issue.
Will the Minister look sympathetically on the open access application for a service to Grimsby given all our pleading?
Although I might not have too much more to add on LNER services, the hon. Member will know that open access decisions are a matter for the operationally independent Office of Rail and Road.
Assessment & feedback
Commitment to look sympathetically at the application
Pointing Decision To Another Body
Response accuracy
Q6 Partial Answer
Richard Holden Con
Basildon and Billericay
Context
The public is concerned about the clarity of Government's plan for state control of railways. They have doubts about simpler fares, passenger growth targets, and reducing taxpayer subsidy.
Does this lack of a clear plan explain why the Secretary of State has been reduced to claiming credit for work delivered under previous governments?
I encourage the shadow Secretary of State actually to read the Railways Bill, which his party has consistently voted against, where the reason for pursuing nationalisation is laid out: better services for passengers and ensuring railways serve public interest not profit, leaving behind privatised system's decades of misery.
Assessment & feedback
The actual lack of a clear plan
Challenging Opposition To Read The Bill
Response accuracy
Q7 Partial Answer
Richard Holden Con
Basildon and Billericay
Context
A previous statement by Minister regarding operational savings under public ownership is questioned for its accuracy compared to the cost of scaling up DfTO staffing.
Does he agree with his own past statement that nationalised railways save taxpayers up to £110-150 million annually?
The shadow Secretary of State talks about value for money but fails to account for the cost of national rail strikes under last Government costing taxpayers £850 million. I ask how that compares with operational savings achieved by nationalised railways.
Assessment & feedback
Confirmation on past statement's accuracy
Challenging Opposition To Account For Strike Costs
Response accuracy