Legal Profession Government Criticism 2020-11-05
2020-11-05
TAGS
Response quality
Questions & Answers
Q1
Partial Answer
▸
Context
Public criticism by the government towards lawyers has been controversial.
What discussions she has had with Cabinet colleagues on recent public criticism of the legal profession by the Government?
I speak regularly with Cabinet colleagues, including the Home Secretary, and I am in no doubt whatever that this Government are rightly proud of the UK's legal tradition and our legal profession. We benefit enormously from the contribution of our excellent and hard-working lawyers, and I will always champion our profession and lawyers of all stripes, whichever side they represent, but sadly from time to time there are those who take advantage of their position and abuse the court process.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Did not address specific discussions with Cabinet about criticism
Response accuracy
Q2
Partial Answer
▸
Context
Attorney General has been criticized for not addressing attacks on lawyers.
Does the Attorney General agree that she has to speak out and say that she does not condone these attacks? Will she explain what steps she has taken to address the matter with Cabinet members?
I am proud of the profession, and in my role as head of the Bar, I will not hesitate to champion the interests of our lawyers. Indeed, given that it is Pro Bono Week, I take this opportunity to thank the thousands of lawyers out there who regularly give their time and their services free of charge on a pro bono basis, helping some of the most vulnerable in our society.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Did not address specific steps taken or condemn attacks
Response accuracy
Q3
Partial Answer
▸
Context
Prime Minister made controversial statements at the Conservative Party conference.
Will she at least see that the chair of the Bar gets a reply to that letter sent a month ago?
Lawyers play a vital role in our justice system and in upholding our democratic society. However, I find the words of the Lord Chief Justice very useful. He recently took the opportunity in the Court of Appeal to make the general point that it is a matter of regret that a minority of lawyers have lent their professional weight and support to vexatious representations and abusive late legal challenges.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Did not provide commitment on letter response
Response accuracy
Q4
Partial Answer
▸
Context
Concerns about the independence of the legal profession.
Does she recognise that it lies in the hands of parliamentarians and legislators to correct faults in the system that are abused?
My hon. Friend and I are in total agreement on this. I know that during his years of practice at the Bar, he will have been part of a profession that upheld the highest standards. Generally, the profession is very well policed. We have a robust code of conduct. We have regulatory authorities that call out and discipline those lawyers who fall short of the standards.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Did not commit to enhancing public legal education
Response accuracy
Q5
Partial Answer
▸
Context
References by Home Secretary and Prime Minister regarding lawyers.
Will she today condemn the references to criminal defence lawyers and immigration lawyers as “activists” and “do-gooders”?
Yes, I know that the hon. Lady had an esteemed career as a lawyer, and we share a common interest in upholding the position of lawyers in our society. Any violence—I must make this clear—is utterly deplorable against any lawyer or anyone going about their work.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Did not explicitly condemn references to lawyers as activists/do-gooders
Response accuracy
Q6
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The question arises from the Attorney General's comments on the Home Office and Prime Minister's remarks that were seen as devaluing lawyers' values. There are concerns about sources in Government and Whitehall identifying individual law firms and lawyers for anonymous briefings.
I think many in the legal profession will be horrified by the approach that the Attorney General is taking today. She must, like the Lord Chancellor, accept that the comments from the Home Office and the Prime Minister went way beyond legitimate criticism, devaluing the values of lawyers and questioning their motivation. Will she join the criticism of the remarks that were made? Will she also investigate whether sources in the Government and Whitehall have been responsible for identifying individual law firms and lawyers when anonymously briefing newspapers about activities that the Home Secretary and No. 10 are angered by?
The hon. Gentleman refers to law firms and, by implication, the incident, which was very serious and, as I say, deplorable. It is not something to trivialise or politicise, and we should be careful not to draw conclusions about any incident that is under investigation. We know that the vast majority of lawyers who specialise in immigration law are upholding the highest standards, are devoted to their clients and are working to secure justice. But we only have to look at the records of the Bar Standards Board or the Solicitors Regulation Authority to see that there are those who fall short of those high standards, and it is right that action should be taken to stop that sub-optimal delivery of service.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The specific ask about joining criticism of Home Office and Prime Minister remarks was not directly addressed. The investigation into sources in Government and Whitehall for anonymous briefings was also not confirmed or denied.
Trivialise
Politicise
Response accuracy