Strategic Defence Review Timescale 2020-11-02
2020-11-02
TAGS
Response quality
Questions & Answers
Q1
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The MP inquired about the timeline for conducting a strategic defence review.
What is his proposed timescale for the next strategic defence review?
The Government announced on 21 October that they will conduct a one-year spending review for 2021-22. The implications of that decision for the integrated review are currently being considered. The Government will provide an update to Parliament once this has been decided.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Providing a specific timescale
Response accuracy
Q2
Partial Answer
▸
Context
In 2019, a report by the NATO Parliamentary Assembly highlighted the growing maritime threat from Russia. The MP requested to meet with relevant officials to feed into naval demands for the future.
Will my right hon. Friend meet me and other members of the Assembly so that we may feed into the review of forward and ongoing naval demands for the foreseeable future?
I congratulate my right hon. Friend on his work in leading the UK delegation to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly. The UK, along with NATO allies, takes the maritime threat from Russia very seriously. This tempo and assertiveness of our operational output will continue for as long as Russia continues to pose a threat and challenge to freedom of navigation. My hon. Friend the Minister for the Armed Forces would be delighted to meet him and his colleagues to discuss it further.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Arranging specific meeting details
Response accuracy
Q3
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The MP acknowledged the armed forces' role during the second national lockdown and asked for a timeline of the integrated review.
When will it be published?
I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman for paying tribute to the armed forces... We are thinking through the impact of the Treasury's announcement that there will be a one-year spending settlement. Once we have thought through those consequences and worked through the implications, I will report straight to the House on what that means.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Publication date for the integrated review
Response accuracy
Q4
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The MP criticized the Chancellor's decision to conduct a one-year spending review, arguing it hinders future defence planning.
A fully fledged, fully funded strategic defence and security review is needed now more than ever. What does he say about the failure to deliver on that?
I think the right hon. Gentleman delivered the speech for a potential future statement... I respectfully suggest that he waits until we have thought through the implications. Then we can have that discussion in Parliament.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Specific criticisms and failures to deliver
Response accuracy
Q5
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The MP expressed concerns about the postponement of a multi-year spending settlement and its impact on future nuclear warhead systems.
Can he tell us what the consequences of the postponement are for the future nuclear warheads system and, in particular, the W93?
As I said to the right hon. Member for Wentworth and Dearne (John Healey), the first thing is to wait until we have worked through the consequences of the one-year spending announcement by the Treasury... I, or indeed the Prime Minister, will then be happy to come and update the House about what that means for the integrated review and the consequences that follow.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Specific implications on nuclear systems
Response accuracy
Q6
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The question stems from a letter sent by the Secretary of State to members of Congress in April stating that support for the W93 program is critical. Concerns have been raised about potential funding issues following an election outcome.
Support to the W93 programme in this budget cycle is critical, as stated by the Secretary of State. Given press reports and his Department's alarm over a possible Democratic victory impacting US support for this programme, does he agree with Tom McTague's assessment that Britain's strategy itself may be an existential challenge?
The hon. Gentleman misunderstands; the UK will maintain a £41 billion defence budget, one of Europe's largest. The nuclear deterrent and submarines are not under threat despite any single-year funding settlement. Steps will be taken to address financial challenges but this does not mean an end to our strategic goals or commitments.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The specific concern about the existential challenge of Britain's strategy due to US election outcomes was not directly addressed.
Response accuracy
Q7
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The Prime Minister previously assured that the integrated review would not be delayed. This review is seen as crucial for establishing a robust defence posture to support foreign policy ambitions.
A one-year funding settlement will render the integrated review nearly meaningless. The Prime Minister promised no delay in its publication, which sets out full spending commitments and supports 'global Britain'. Delaying it could question our justification for a UN Security Council seat. I urge the Defence Secretary to complete this review as scheduled or with multi-year funding if necessary.
My right hon. Friend raises valid points. However, it is premature to speculate without seeing the implications of the Treasury's one-year funding settlement announcement. He may address his concerns at future Treasury questions.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The specific request for completing the review on schedule was not directly addressed.
Speculation Is Just Speculation
Response accuracy