End of Transition Period National Security) 2020-12-14
2020-12-14
TAGS
Response quality
Questions & Answers
Q1
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The question concerns the potential negative effects on national security following the end of the transition period, a critical issue for UK's safety and cooperation with EU partners.
What recent assessment has she made of the potential effect of the end of the transition period on national security?
The safety and security of our citizens remains our priority. We are working closely with operational partners to ensure we are ready for a range of scenarios at the end of the transition period. We will continue to co-operate with European and international partners to tackle shared security threats.
▸
Assessment & feedback
No specific contingency plans or measures were mentioned in response to the question about emergency plans.
Response accuracy
Q2
Partial Answer
▸
Context
Concerns have been raised about the impact of losing access to EU databases such as the Schengen information system, which could increase average conviction times from six days to 60 days. This scenario highlights a significant capability gap and potential security risks.
The deputy assistant commissioner of the Metropolitan police has noted that losing access to EU databases like Schengen will extend criminal conviction time significantly, calling this a 'capability gap' with a 'massive impact'. In case of no-deal Brexit, what emergency contingency plans does the Department have in place?
National security remains our absolute priority. This country is a safe country and will remain so after the end of the transition period. Alternative arrangements are in place if negotiations fail, transitioning cooperation to non-EU mechanisms by the end of the transition period.
▸
Assessment & feedback
No specific emergency plans or immediate actions were detailed beyond general statements about preparedness.
Response accuracy
Q3
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The Minister's letter to the MP stated that in a no-deal scenario, fallback arrangements would be used. However, concerns have been raised about these being 'slower and more clunky' and potentially leaving the country less safe.
Does he agree with former National Security Adviser's comments that fallbacks are slower and less effective? Can he promise to deliver an agreement that retains or improves levels of co-operation, as called for by UK Counter Terrorism Policing?
This country will remain one of the safest in the world. The UK is and will continue to be a global leader on national security, with all agencies prepared for the transition period end. I hope he notes our level of preparedness.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The effectiveness of fallback arrangements and specific commitments were not addressed directly; instead, assurances about continued leadership in security were provided.
Response accuracy