Myanmar ICJ Case 2020-11-24
2020-11-24
TAGS
Response quality
Questions & Answers
Q1
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The question arises from the situation where Canada and the Netherlands are joining Gambia in a case against Myanmar at the International Court of Justice for alleged genocide of the Rohingya people. This action raises implications for UK policies regarding international justice.
What assessment has been made of the implications for UK policies of Canada and the Netherlands formally joining the Gambia in the ICJ case on the genocide of Rohingya by the Myanmar Government?
The UK Government supports the ICJ process and urges Myanmar to comply with provisional measures. They are aware of intentions from Canada and the Netherlands and will take a final decision once the case progresses. The government continues to monitor closely and considers whether intervention would add value.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The specific commitment on joining the case was not provided.
Monitoring Closely
Considering Whether Intervention
Response accuracy
Q2
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The question follows previous inquiries about the UK's involvement in a legal case against Myanmar at the International Court of Justice for alleged genocide. The issue has been raised multiple times due to concerns over justice and accountability.
Failure to secure justice and hold Burmese Government accountable sends dangerous message; will the Minister clearly state if the UK Government will join the ICJ case? If not, can he commit to a future decision soon?
Acknowledges work on accountability issues, supports the ICJ process for putting pressure on Myanmar. Agrees with UN fact-finding mission that 2017 events constitute ethnic cleansing. Considers genocide determination by competent courts like the ICJ.
▸
Assessment & feedback
No clear commitment to join or future decision timeframe was given.
Monitoring Closely
Considering Whether Intervention
Response accuracy