Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Family Justice System 2026-06-30

Tuesday 30 June 2026 · 2 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 1 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Ministerial Questions addressed issues in the Family Justice System on 2026-06-30
  • Liberal Democrat MP Max Wilkinson raised concerns about financial arrangements in 50:50 care cases
  • Labour MP Josh Fenton-Glynn asked for reassurance on repealing the presumption of contact in family courts

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

Concerns about financial fairness when family courts decide on a 50:50 care split, leading to unequal financial outcomes due to decisions made by the Child Maintenance Service based on child benefit status.

Question

When family courts decide that care is to be split between parents 50:50, we might expect that fair financial arrangements follow. However, when courts make that ruling, and the Child Maintenance Service makes decisions based on which parent is the recipient of child benefit, one parent often finds they are significantly worse off than the other. Will Ministers have a word with their colleagues in the Department for Work and Pensions to ensure that the justice system and the CMS work more closely to achieve financial fairness for both parents in cases where courts rule for 50:50 care splits?

Answer from Sarah Sackman

In individual cases, how those financial settlements are made is a matter for the judiciary. There should be join-up between areas of Government, and I am happy to take away his direction that we should liaise with DWP colleagues to ensure child maintenance is addressed fairly.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific commitment to address financial fairness issues in 50:50 care splits

How: Will Take Away His Direction

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q2 Josh Fenton-Glynn Lab Calder Valley
Context

Concerns about the justice for children murdered by abusive ex-partners, highlighting a need to repeal the presumption of parental involvement in the Children Act 1989.

Question

Will the Minister reassure me that we remain committed to repealing in this Parliament the presumption of contact in family courts, to bring full justice to the 67 children murdered at the hands of abusive ex-partners with whom contact should never have been granted?

Answer from Sarah Sackman

We are resolute and committed to repealing the presumption of parental involvement in the Children Act 1989 through the Courts and Tribunals Bill. The campaigning efforts have been heroic, and we will redouble our efforts to ensure repeal.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email