Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Indefinite Leave to Remain: Skilled Legal Migrants

Monday 8 June 2026 · 3 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 3 Not answered 0

Key points

  • The UK government is assessing the impact of proposed changes to indefinite leave to remain on skilled legal migrants.
  • The Home Secretary stated that the new immigration system aims to attract high-earners and those in public service roles.
  • The government is working with the Ministry of Defence to waive visa fees for spouses and children of armed forces personnel and veterans.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Laura Kyrke-Smith Lab Aylesbury
Immigration
Context

The MP noted the uncertainty and difficulty faced by residents in Aylesbury who are here on skilled worker visas due to proposed changes to ILR.

Question

What assessment has been made of the potential impact of the proposed changes to indefinite leave to remain on skilled legal migrants resident in the UK?

Answer from Mike Tapp

Our immigration system must operate in a way that attracts the best and the brightest. Earned settlement will reward those who integrate and contribute to this country, with shorter pathways for higher earners and those in public service roles among others. We are carefully considering responses to our public consultation before setting out the next steps.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific assessment of impacts on skilled legal migrants was not provided.

How: Carefully Considering, Before Setting Out

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q2 Laura Kyrke-Smith Lab Aylesbury
Immigration Care & Healthcare Workers Employment
Context

The MP highlighted a community event at Herali, a restaurant in Aylesbury, which depends on staff with skilled worker visas. The proposed changes to ILR create uncertainty.

Question

Last month I joined a very generous community event at Herali, a much-loved Sri Lankan restaurant in Aylesbury, which is dependent on staff who are here on skilled worker visas. The proposed changes to ILR put many of my local residents, including Sri Lankans and Indians, in a very uncertain and difficult position. That is equally difficult for their employers, whether in the care sector, nurseries or hospitality businesses such as Herali. Will the Minister tell me what reassurance I can offer to these skilled legal migrants, who are such an important part of our communities?

Answer from Mike Tapp

That sounds like a fantastic restaurant. As the Home Secretary has already laid out, there are around 1 million young people currently out of education, employment or training. We are creating a system that is firm, protects the economy, protects welfare from rising further and avoids more pressure on our social housing demands, and also fair, so that it encourages and rewards genuine economic contribution and integration. We have consulted and had 200,000 responses, and we are working on a final solution, which will be announced in due course.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific reassurances for skilled workers were not provided.

How: Working On, Will Be Announced

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q3 Ben Obese-Jecty Con Huntingdon
Immigration Defence Veterans
Context

The MP noted the government's vote against an amendment to waive visa fees for spouses and children of armed forces personnel and veterans, which was a Labour manifesto pledge.

Question

Last week, the Government voted against my amendment to the Armed Forces Bill, new clause 5, which would have waived visa fees for the spouses and children of armed forces personnel and veterans. That was, of course, a Labour manifesto pledge—as it was a Conservative manifesto pledge— to ensure that the families of those who have fought to defend this country are allowed to reside here without being charged £3,229 per person just to remain in the country following service. I understand that the reason the policy has not been pursued is a Home Office issue, rather than a Defence issue, so will the Minister explain why it has not been progressed in two years? Could he give an update on whether the policy will be amended when the changes come out later this year?

Answer from Mike Tapp

I thank the hon. Member for his question—as a veteran, it is an important question, and I respect it. I am working with colleagues in the Ministry of Defence at the moment to deliver that important manifesto commitment.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The reason why the policy has not been pursued was not explained.

How: Working With, To Deliver

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)