Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Child Poverty

Wednesday 15 April 2026 · 3 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Key points

  • Pamela Nash questioned the Secretary of State about steps being taken to tackle child poverty in Scotland.
  • The Secretary of State highlighted Labour's actions in lifting children out of poverty, contrasting with previous government policies.
  • David Mundell emphasized the need to focus on child poverty and other challenges during the Scottish Parliament election campaign.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Pamela Nash Lab Motherwell, Wishaw and Carluke

Question

What steps he is taking with Cabinet colleagues to help tackle child poverty in Scotland.

Answer from Douglas Alexander

Tackling child poverty is fundamental to the work of this Labour Government. In December, we published our ambitious and comprehensive UK-wide child poverty strategy. It sets out the steps we are taking to reduce child poverty in the short term, as well as putting in place the building blocks we need to create long-term change across the United Kingdom. On its own, our decision to lift the two-child cap, which came into effect just last week, will benefit 95,000 children in Scotland.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q2 Pamela Nash Lab Motherwell, Wishaw and Carluke
Context

The question arises from the ongoing debate on child poverty statistics in Scotland. One in four children in the MP's constituency live in poverty.

Question

Does the Secretary of State agree that the Scottish National party has failed Scotland's children over the past two decades, leaving thousands in poverty, including one in four in my constituency? Labour has shown by lifting the two-child cap which is now benefiting over 13,000 children in Lanarkshire.

Answer from Douglas Alexander

First, on the conduct of the Government: the Conservatives in government pushed kids into poverty; Labour in government lifts kids out of poverty. There are 10,000 kids in Scotland without a home to call their own. The previous First Minister's challenge was to close the educational attainment gap in Scotland, but this gap has widened.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q3 David Mundell Con Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale
Context

The MP disagrees with the Secretary of State's analysis but emphasizes that child poverty and other challenges should be the focus rather than independence. The questioner mentions a Reform UK candidate in Dumfriesshire voting for independence.

Question

Obviously I do not agree with the Secretary of State's analysis, but I think we can agree that child poverty and the other challenges that face real people in Scotland should be the focus of this Scottish Parliament election campaign, and not independence, for which, incredibly, the Reform UK candidate in Dumfriesshire voted. Does the Secretary of State agree that anybody in Scotland who does not want to see Scotland spend five more years in a constitutional cul-de-sac should use their vote wisely to stop an SNP majority?

Answer from Douglas Alexander

It is always important for the electorate to use their votes wisely, but the fact is that there are two parties that are deeply threatened by Scottish Labour's emergence as the credible alternative to the SNP. They are, on the one hand, the Scottish National party and, on the other hand, Reform. If we think about it, their interests are completely aligned, in talking Reform up and talking Scottish Labour down.

Not addressed: The specific ask was not addressed regarding preventing an SNP majority or avoiding further years of constitutional debate.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)