Questions & Answers
Q1
Partial Answer
What steps he is taking with Cabinet colleagues to help tackle child poverty in Scotland.
Tackling child poverty is fundamental to the work of this Labour Government. In December, we published our ambitious and comprehensive UK-wide child poverty strategy. It sets out the steps we are taking to reduce child poverty in the short term, as well as putting in place the building blocks we need to create long-term change across the United Kingdom. On its own, our decision to lift the two-child cap, which came into effect just last week, will benefit 95,000 children in Scotland.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Response accuracy
Q2
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The question arises from the ongoing debate on child poverty statistics in Scotland. One in four children in the MP's constituency live in poverty.
Does the Secretary of State agree that the Scottish National party has failed Scotland's children over the past two decades, leaving thousands in poverty, including one in four in my constituency? Labour has shown by lifting the two-child cap which is now benefiting over 13,000 children in Lanarkshire.
First, on the conduct of the Government: the Conservatives in government pushed kids into poverty; Labour in government lifts kids out of poverty. There are 10,000 kids in Scotland without a home to call their own. The previous First Minister's challenge was to close the educational attainment gap in Scotland, but this gap has widened.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Response accuracy
Q3
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The MP disagrees with the Secretary of State's analysis but emphasizes that child poverty and other challenges should be the focus rather than independence. The questioner mentions a Reform UK candidate in Dumfriesshire voting for independence.
Obviously I do not agree with the Secretary of State's analysis, but I think we can agree that child poverty and the other challenges that face real people in Scotland should be the focus of this Scottish Parliament election campaign, and not independence, for which, incredibly, the Reform UK candidate in Dumfriesshire voted. Does the Secretary of State agree that anybody in Scotland who does not want to see Scotland spend five more years in a constitutional cul-de-sac should use their vote wisely to stop an SNP majority?
It is always important for the electorate to use their votes wisely, but the fact is that there are two parties that are deeply threatened by Scottish Labour's emergence as the credible alternative to the SNP. They are, on the one hand, the Scottish National party and, on the other hand, Reform. If we think about it, their interests are completely aligned, in talking Reform up and talking Scottish Labour down.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The specific ask was not addressed regarding preventing an SNP majority or avoiding further years of constitutional debate.
Response accuracy