Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Student Loan System

Monday 2 March 2026 · 6 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 4 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Ministerial Department considering ways to make the student loan system fairer.
  • Government raised the repayment threshold and reintroduced maintenance grants.
  • Concerns raised about the fairness and sustainability of the current system.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Mohammad Yasin Lab Bedford
Context

The student loans system is under scrutiny for fairness and adequacy in supporting graduates. Previous government actions have raised concerns about the system's sustainability and equity.

Question

What steps her Department is taking to improve the student loans system. I am concerned about the current state of the student loans system and the fairness of it after previous Governments ruined the university funding model.

Answer from Josh MacAlister

We will consider ways to make the student loan system fairer; there are a range of options. We need to do it carefully. We have already reintroduced maintenance grants and raised the repayment threshold to above average graduate salaries.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific actions or reforms to improve the student loan system are not provided

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q2 David Chadwick Lib Dem Brecon, Radnor and Cwm Tawe
Economy
Context

Graduates are experiencing financial stress due to high debt levels and are questioning the value of their education due to mounting debts and a lack of job security.

Question

Many graduates feel as if they are drowning in debt and that they were sold a promise—that a university education would help them to pay off their debts quickly—which has not come true. Their debts continue to mount. Will the Government consider scrapping the planned freeze of the repayment threshold?

Answer from Josh MacAlister

We will consider ways to make the system fairer; there are a range of options. The threshold freeze raises £5.9 billion next year, and it is incumbent on any party that is serious about fiscal prudence to set out how it would pay for changes.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific action to scrap the planned freeze of the repayment threshold is not addressed

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q3 Mohammad Yasin Lab Bedford
Context

Student loan problems have long predated the current plan 2 loans, and generational inequality is a concern.

Question

Student loan problems long predate plan 2 loans. I welcome the Government's commitment to making the system fairer after previous Governments ruined the university funding model. It is wrong that generational inequality is baked into the system, which leaves young people with debts for which they can service only the interest. Does the Minister agree that tinkering is not enough, and that fundamental reform is now urgent?

Answer from Josh MacAlister

I recognise my hon. Friend's description of recent history and how we have ended up where we are today. We will consider ways to make the system fairer. As I say, there are a range of options, and we need to do it carefully.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific commitment to fundamental reform is not provided

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q4 Graham Stuart Con Beverley and Holderness
Education Taxation
Context

A constituent, Sammi, who graduated in 2016 with £40,000 in student loans, now has £46,000 due to high interest rates. She is seeking concrete action to stop the outrageous interest rates.

Question

Sammi from Keyingham in my constituency, who was one of the first in her family to go to university, graduated in 2016 after borrowing £40,000. She has now been working in the medical field for over four years, but that £40,000 has grown to £46,000. I was glad to hear the Minister's previous answer, but Sammi and others want to hear that there will be concrete action to stop the outrageous interest, which is higher than one would expect for a personal loan or a mortgage. Will the Minister do something about it?

Answer from Josh MacAlister

I hope the right hon. Member started by apologising to Sammi in his correspondence, because the last Government froze the threshold on 10 separate occasions. I could list them all. They started in the year that the policy was designed and introduced—the same year in which the commitment was made to increase the threshold in line with inflation, which the Conservatives did not do.

Not addressed: The question about high interest rates is not addressed

How: Redirecting Blame To Previous Government

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q5 Helen Hayes Lab Dulwich and West Norwood
Education
Context

There are escalating concerns about plan 2 student loans, including unilateral and unexpected changes in repayment terms and repayments based on the consumer prices index.

Question

Concerns raised in recent weeks about plan 2 student loans, including unilateral and unexpected change in the repayment terms and repayments based on the consumer prices index, are about the promise of higher education: whether working hard for an undergraduate degree really does result in a good quality of life when graduates face 30 years of student loan repayments on these terms. In the light of these escalating concerns, can the Minister tell the House what discussions he has had with the Treasury on this issue, and when we can expect to see the work that he promises to make plan 2 loans fairer for students?

Answer from Josh MacAlister

I know the Chair of the Education Committee is looking at these issues and the Government will be very interested in that work. We will set out the details of our work soon. My hon. Friend is right to highlight how transformational higher education can be. I would not want any young person outside this place who is listening to this debate to take away from it that they should not make every step forward to follow their talents.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific timing or details of discussions with Treasury are not provided

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q6 Jack Rankin Con Windsor
Education
Context

There is criticism that political choices include balancing budgets on the back of aspirational graduates, impacting the fairness of the student loan system.

Question

On “Newsnight” on 23 February, the Minister for School Standards acknowledged that the student loan system is not perfect, but justified no change by saying the Government face huge pressure and must make tough choices. Given spending choices made since this Government came to power, is not the truth that the political choices that the Minister's colleagues are talking about include balancing their “Benefits Street” Budget on the back of aspirational graduates?

Answer from Josh MacAlister

I would like to think there is cross-party agreement that tackling educational inequality is one of the most important things that we can do. It is a shame on our country that we are one of the most unequal when it comes to the relationship between how well a child can do at school and how much money is in their parents' pockets. The Labour party is all about addressing such inequalities, and that is what this Government are doing. That is in no way at odds with finding ways to make our student loan system fairer and fixing it after the 10 years of freezes on thresholds by the Conservatives that hit working graduates.

Not addressed: The question about balancing budgets on the back of graduates is not addressed

How: Criticising Opposition Party

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email