Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Energy Infrastructure Technology: Chinese Imports

Tuesday 10 February 2026 · 3 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 3 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Gregory Stafford asked about the security implications of importing energy infrastructure technologies from China.
  • The Minister responded that the Government prioritizes national security and conducts thorough scrutiny of energy infrastructure investments.
  • Perran Moon highlighted the potential of domestic geothermal energy production in Cornwall to insulate the UK from Chinese security issues.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Gregory Stafford Con Farnham and Bordon
Context

Reports from Norway and Denmark suggest that Chinese-manufactured electric buses contain remote kill switch technology, raising concerns about the national security risks of importing energy infrastructure technologies from China.

Question

Given reports from Norway and Denmark that Chinese-manufactured electric buses contain remote kill switch technology, and that recent UK-China engagement appears to have delivered an embassy for the Chinese and little more than a Labubu for the United Kingdom, how can the Minister be confident that Chinese-made energy infrastructure does not pose similar national security risks? What steps is she taking to remove our reliance on Chinese-made infrastructure?

Answer from Katie White

That is slightly audacious, given that when we left government in 2010 we had, I think, three of the top solar companies in the world, but when we came back into office we had nothing—there was no supply chain. National security is this Government's No. 1 overriding priority. We are engaging constructively with every opportunity and all actors but at the same time making sure that every single decision takes into account our national security, which comes first above anything else.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The steps being taken to remove reliance on Chinese-made infrastructure were not specified.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q2 Gregory Stafford Con Farnham and Bordon
Context

The MP is concerned about the potential impact of energy infrastructure-related technologies imported from China on national security.

Question

What assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of energy infrastructure-related technologies imported from China on security?

Answer from Katie White

This Government take energy security extremely seriously. We run one of the world's safest, most reliable energy systems, and we are a top destination for investment. Investment in our energy infrastructure undergoes the highest level of national security scrutiny.

Partly answered

Not addressed: No specific assessment or concrete details on the impact were provided.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q3 Perran Moon Lab Camborne and Redruth
Context

Geothermal Engineering Ltd in Cornwall is on the verge of opening the UK's first ever geothermal electricity plant, which will produce energy and lithium from beneath the ground.

Question

Domestic production of clean energy infrastructure technologies insulates us from Chinese security issues. In Cornwall we are on the cusp of significant geothermal baseload energy production. Geothermal Engineering Ltd in my constituency will imminently open the UK's first ever geothermal electricity plant, producing energy and lithium from beneath our feet. Will the Minister ensure that there will be ministerial representation at this key milestone in the UK's clean energy transition?

Answer from Katie White

From China to Cornwall, Mr Speaker! I thank my hon. Friend for his continued championing of Cornwall, geothermal energy and critical minerals. This Government support geothermal, and we will engage constructively at any key moment.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific commitment regarding ministerial representation was not given.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email