Context
The question follows an assessment on the Crown Prosecution Service’s serious economic, organised crime and international directorate's work. Rachel Taylor references a conflict of interest involving the shadow Attorney General advising Roman Abramovich.
Question
As a practising solicitor for more than 20 years, I am aware of the rules and professional guidance on conflicts of interest. Does the Solicitor General agree that the shadow Attorney General recusing himself from giving legal advice to the Leader of the Opposition because he would rather profit from advising Abramovich demonstrates where the priorities lie for this Conservative party when it comes to backing the Government on economic sanctions in defence of Ukraine and our national security?
Answer from The Solicitor General
It is utterly indefensible that the shadow Attorney General in the other place is acting as a lawyer for sanctioned Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich. He has recused himself from giving legal advice to the Conservative party on the issue of Ukraine and financial sanctions, sacrificing a key element of his role in order to work against our national interests. The Government are putting national security at the heart of every decision and stands in staunch solidarity with Ukraine.
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)