Context
The previous assessment led to the suspension of arms export licences to Israel in September 2024 due to concerns about their use in military operations in Gaza. Since then, Israeli forces have killed over 481 Palestinians and suspended humanitarian aid from 37 international NGOs during a ceasefire.
Question
Since revisiting the pause on arms export licences was linked to movement towards a sustainable peace, but Israel has continued its actions against Palestinians and hindered humanitarian aid, how can the Government justify resuming these licences instead of suspending them entirely?
Answer from Chris Bryant (The Minister of State, Department for Business and Trade)
While I agree that we need to see a proper lasting peace based on justice and cooperation, suggesting it is business as usual is incorrect. We have suspended licences where there is a threat to Gaza due to Israel’s failure to comply with international humanitarian law. Export licences are required only for military and dual-use equipment, which includes items used by NGOs like armour for journalists. A case-by-case approach is appropriate.
Not addressed: The full commitment to suspend all arms exports until Israel complies with international law was not addressed.
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)