Context
Following the International Court of Justice's advisory opinion ruling that Israeli occupation and settlements are illegal, and the UN General Assembly giving Israel a 12-month deadline to end its unlawful presence which has since expired.
Question
In July 2024, the ICJ ruled that the Israeli occupation and settlements were illegal and must be ended and dismantled. Then, in September 2024, the UN General Assembly gave Israel a 12-month deadline to end its unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, which has now lapsed by more than four months. Why have the Government still not published their response to the ICJ advisory opinion? Is there something that we do not know, but perhaps should?
In that period, the UK has made a range of significant determinations in relation to our policy in the middle east. Of course, we continue to consider the Court’s advisory opinion on Israel’s occupation carefully. There is lots in that advisory opinion with which we agree, and which is, indeed, already Government policy. We agree that settlements are illegal, and we have already taken strong action against them. Since this Government came into office, we have introduced three packages of sanctions related to violence against communities in the west bank, and we continue to keep these matters under review.
Not addressed: The specific request for a published response was not directly addressed; instead, general actions taken by the government were mentioned without providing concrete details on why no official response has been issued.
How: Under Review, Already Government Policy
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)