Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Private Rent Inflation

Monday 12 January 2026 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Ministerial Questions took place on 2026-01-12 regarding private rent inflation.
  • Dan Carden from Liverpool Walton raised concerns about high rent increases in Liverpool, citing an 8% rise above the English average.
  • The Government responded by emphasizing the review of the Renters' Rights Act and highlighted tenants' rights to challenge unfair rent hikes through a first-tier tribunal.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Dan Carden Lab Liverpool Walton
Context

The MP noted that constituents are being pushed out of their homes due to unreasonable rent increases by unscrupulous landlords. He mentioned average rents in Liverpool have risen by 8%, exceeding the national average for England.

Question

I regularly hear from constituents who are being pushed out of their homes by rip-off hikes from unscrupulous landlords. The average rents in Liverpool have risen by 8%, well above the average for England. I welcome the Government’s action through the Renters’ Rights Act to tackle unfair rent increases, but it concerns me that market rents will be used as a benchmark to prevent unaffordable rents from rising. How will the Government review the effectiveness of these measures, and, if necessary, will they consider further action in due course?

Answer from The Minister for Housing and Planning (Matthew Pennycook)

We will of course keep the implementation of the Act under continual review, but, as I have said, it allows tenants to challenge unreasonable rent increases at the first-tier tribunal, which will make a judgment on whether the increases are fair and meet that market-rate definition. We have, however, made it clear that the Government do not support the introduction of rent controls, including rent stabilisation measures, for the reasons that we debated at some length during the passage of the Bill.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The Minister did not provide a specific timeline or mechanism for reviewing the Act's effectiveness.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email