Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Budget: Work Incentives

Tuesday 9 December 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Key points

  • Jack Rankin questioned the Prime Minister about the high numbers of young people not in work, education, or training and those on long-term sickness benefits.
  • The Prime Minister responded by agreeing that the issues are a moral and economic disgrace.
  • The Prime Minister attributed the creation of these issues to the Conservative party.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

Concern over high unemployment rates and long-term sickness benefit recipients. The questioner mentions 1 million young people not in work, education or training and 2.8 million out of work on long-term benefits.

Question

Having 1 million young people not in work, education or training and 700 thousand people out of work on long-term sickness benefits is both a financial catastrophe and a moral failure. The Prime Minister has rightly said that it is his moral mission to get young people into work, but how does the Minister square that with two Budgets that have hiked taxes on working people by £66 billion while giving a pay rise to those on benefits?

Answer from Torsten Bell (Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury)

The hon. Member is right to call those things a moral and economic disgrace. Does he know who created them? It was the Conservative party opposite. Who saw a 50% rise in the number of those not in education, employment or training? The party opposite. Who created the benefits system that is failing today? The party opposite. Who failed to reform the benefits system? The party opposite.

Not addressed: The questioner's specific ask about reconciling tax hikes and benefit increases was avoided by blaming previous policies of another political party.

How: Blaming A Previous Government, Shifting Focus To Opposition Failures

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email