Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

SEND Pupils: Suspensions and Exclusions

Monday 1 December 2025 · 3 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Answered 1 Partly answered 2 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Ministerial questions focused on SEND pupils' suspension rates and safety concerns.
  • The Government plans to address SEND issues through a White Paper to be released.
  • Parents and educators are concerned about pupil safety regarding weapons in schools.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Cameron Thomas Ind Tewkesbury
Children & Families
Context

The question concerns the increase in suspensions for pupils with an education, health and care plan while those without such plans have seen a decline. The issue is further complicated by delayed reforms.

Question

While the suspension rate for pupils without identified special educational needs declined by 75% in the 2024 autumn term, suspensions for pupils with an education, health and care plan increased, according to the Department for Education’s own data. I have previously urged the Government to tackle this crisis centrally, as local authorities across the country continue to prove to be unable to manage. With their SEND reforms already delayed until 2026, how will the Government bridge this divide to ensure that every child is able to succeed at school?

Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Education (Olivia Bailey)

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his question and for his interest in this important issue, and I recognise the statistics to which he refers. The Government take the issue extremely seriously and we will be setting out our plans in the White Paper in due course. We are investing in the early years, which is my own area, and ensuring that we have the Best Start in Life family hubs in our communities and SEND-trained professionals, so that we can identify special educational needs early and give children the support that they need before problems escalate.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The minister did not address how to bridge the divide or provide specific steps given the delays in reforms.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q2 Saqib Bhatti Con Meriden and Solihull East
Crime & Law Enforcement Education
Context

The question relates to a specific case where a student was stabbed by another who had previously brought an axe into school. The issue revolves around whether children bringing knives should be expelled regardless of background.

Question

The Minister will be aware of the horrific case of Harvey Willgoose, who was stabbed to death by a fellow pupil who had previously brought an axe into school. Parents are rightly worried about such situations, so does the Minister agree that safety must come first and that any child who brings a knife into school must be expelled, regardless of their background—no ifs, no buts?

Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Education (Olivia Bailey)

The case that the hon. Member raises is absolutely horrific. If a child has brought a knife into school, I do not think that there is a headteacher anywhere in the country who would think that that child should continue to be in school.

Answered

Not addressed: null

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q3 Caroline Voaden Lib Dem South Devon
Children & Families
Context

The question addresses the Office for Budget Responsibility's analysis of the Government’s decision to absorb SEND funding into core budgets, raising concerns about reduced funding for children with special educational needs.

Question

In July, the Secretary of State promised a better SEND system, with strengthened support, improved access and more funding, yet even a charitable interpretation of the Office for Budget Responsibility’s analysis of the Government’s decision, announced at the Budget, to absorb SEND funding into core budgets shows several billion pounds of unfunded SEND commitments. Parents around the country are worried that the support that they have fought hard for their children to receive may now be taken away. Will she explain how she will deliver strengthened support, while seemingly having to cut billions from SEND funding through upcoming reforms? Can she guarantee that children will not lose support because of this change?

Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Education (Olivia Bailey)

I thank the hon. Lady for her question, but I encourage her to read the documents from the Treasury and the OBR. I am glad to have the opportunity to clarify the matter, given the wilful misrepresentation of the situation by the Conservative party. Those deficits are council deficits—they will not be coming from the schools’ budgets. In fact, over the course of this Parliament, this Government will be investing more into SEND.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The minister did not provide a specific guarantee that children would not lose support and avoided addressing the OBR's analysis directly.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email