Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Gambling Duty

Thursday 27 November 2025 · 2 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 2 Not answered 0

Key points

  • The Chancellor's announcements on gambling duty could result in up to 16,000 job losses in the high-tech sector.
  • Measures introduced in the Budget aim to lower business rates for over 750 high street businesses to limit economic impact.
  • An additional 26 million over three years has been allocated to the Gambling Commission to increase its resources.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Charlie Dewhirst Con Bridlington and The Wolds
Context

The Chancellor's announcements in yesterday’s Budget regarding gambling duties could lead to up to 16,000 job losses, primarily in the high-tech sector of the industry, and move £6 billion of gambling stakes into the black market.

Question

The Chancellor’s announcements in relation to gambling duty could cost the industry up to 16,000 jobs, largely in the high- tech part of that industry, and move £6 billion of gambling stakes into the black market. Does she agree that taxing something does not necessarily stop it from happening, and that this will move problem gamblers into a less regulated, illegal space?

Answer from Lisa Nandy (Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport)

We have looked at this issue as part of our work leading up to the Budget. We sought to limit the economic impact on high street businesses by focusing tax rises on parts with lower operating costs. Additionally, measures were introduced in the Budget to permanently lower business rates for over 750,000 retail and hospitality properties to help mitigate some of the impacts on betting shops. The aim is to lift 450,000 children out of poverty.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Job losses in high-tech gambling sector

How: We Are Aware Of The Challenges But Cannot Duck Choices.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The questioner acknowledges the decision to tax online gambling, which is seen as a significant issue for families due to its accessibility. The previous government left 4.5 million children in poverty.

Question

I congratulate my right hon. Friend and indeed the Chancellor on making the decision to tax online gambling in particular. The fact that people effectively have a casino in their pocket destroys lives and families, and it is right that we send that strong signal, as well as make sure money is available to tackle the insidious moral scar of child poverty that was left by the previous Government. Can my right hon. Friend confirm how we will ensure that the way we conduct gambling in this country provides better protection to those families and individuals who end up being exposed to some of the most insidious practices of the gambling industry?

Answer from Lisa Nandy (Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport)

Child poverty is a moral scar on this nation. Our focus is not about sending signals but making fair choices to reverse damage done by the previous Government. We have introduced a gambling levy and allocated an additional £26 million over three years to the Gambling Commission to increase resources for tackling illegal markets and preventing harm.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Sending signal versus practical steps

How: Where We Differ Slightly Is That For Me It'S About Making Fair Choices.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email