Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Pride in Place Funding: Glasgow North East

Monday 24 November 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Maureen Burke asked the Minister about the possibility of Pride in Place funding for Glasgow North East.
  • The Minister expressed delight at visiting Glasgow North East to discuss the Pride in Place agenda.
  • The Minister highlighted the Scotland Office's involvement in phase 2 of the Pride in Place program.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Maureen Burke Lab Glasgow North East
Context

A survey by the MP revealed high interest among constituents in the Pride in Place funding, with numerous ideas to transform local areas such as parks and shopfronts. The Scotland Office is currently working on phase 2 of the programme.

Question

My survey of Glasgow North East constituents shows that there is real excitement about the possibility of Pride in Place funding coming their way. From parks and shopfronts to local connectivity, I have been inundated with incredible ideas to transform our corner of Glasgow. Will the Minister commit to giving my constituency bid her full consideration, and will she visit Glasgow North East to see the difference that the investment could make?

Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Miatta Fahnbulleh)

I would be delighted to visit Glasgow North East and am pleased to hear of the local enthusiasm for our Pride in Place agenda and my hon. Friend’s work in supporting this locally and championing her constituency. We are working closely with the Scotland Office on phase 2 of the Pride in Place programme to confirm the specific neighbourhoods and will be announcing that shortly.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The Minister did not provide a direct commitment regarding full consideration for Glasgow North East's bid but expressed willingness to visit.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)