Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

East Sussex County Council: Elections

Monday 24 November 2025 · 4 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 4 Not answered 0

Key points

  • James MacCleary questioned the Conservative administration's handling of East Sussex, citing issues with adult social care and special educational needs support.
  • Paul Holmes inquired if the Secretary of State would rule out cancelling the next local elections, to which the response was that the Government's intention is for all scheduled elections to proceed.
  • Ze Franklin noted that the issue extends beyond East Sussex to other councils facing reorganisation and expressed interest in the ongoing consultation process.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 James MacCleary Lib Dem Lewes
Transport Children & Families Local Government
Context

The MP is concerned about cuts to adult social care, collapsing support for children with special educational needs and disabilities, roads full of potholes in East Sussex. The current administration's term could be extended to six years if elections are cancelled.

Question

Cuts to adult social care, collapsing support for children with special educational needs and disabilities, roads full of potholes—the list goes on. The Conservatives have failed East Sussex for too long and should be held to account. Another delay would mean that the current administration will have their term extended to six years. Can the Secretary of State give me and residents across East Sussex a clear answer on when we will know if we will have the chance to vote this May?

Answer from The Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Steve Reed)

First, I recognise the circumstances that the hon. Member describes, which were left behind by the previous Government’s approach to local government funding. As I said earlier, it remains the Government’s intention that those elections will go ahead as scheduled, unless there is a very strong justification otherwise. That is what will happen.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific timing or criteria for cancellation were not provided.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q2 Paul Holmes Con Hamble Valley
Local Government
Context

The Labour party manifesto did not include local government reform. The Prime Minister refused to rule out further cancellations of local elections last week.

Question

With local government reform not being in the Labour party manifesto and with the Prime Minister last week refusing to rule out further cancellations of local elections, will the Secretary of State now rule out—not “intention” but rule out—cancelling the next local elections, yes or no?

Answer from The Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Steve Reed)

I am sure the hon. Member will be aware that consultations and engagement are going on with local authorities, but the Government’s intention is that all the elections scheduled for next May will go ahead next May.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The Secretary of State avoided giving a definitive ruling out of cancelling elections by referring to consultations and intentions.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q3 Paul Holmes Con Hamble Valley
Local Government
Context

The Secretary of State referred to consultations and engagement but did not provide a clear commitment.

Question

Here we go again: it is the Secretary of State’s “intention”. I remind him that he actually leads his Department and can set the legislation going forward. He needs to accept that the uncertainty created by this Government in relation to local government reorganisation, on sizes and funding, has meant that leaders have scrambled to meet the ever-changing expectations, with no leadership from this Government. Will the Secretary of State put his money where his mouth is and support the Opposition’s amendment to the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill tomorrow that would ensure that local elections go ahead and that local leaders have the certainty they need?

Answer from The Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Steve Reed)

Perhaps to the Conservatives the word “consultation” means “diktat issued from the centre”, but to me it means listening carefully to the views of those who will be affected. My intention, and my preference, remains for the elections to go ahead on schedule.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The Secretary of State avoided supporting or opposing the amendment by reiterating his intentions.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q4 Zöe Franklin Lib Dem Guildford
Local Government
Context

Letters have been sent to councils asking if they would consider cancelling elections.

Question

It has been very interesting to hear the back and forth on this question. It is not just about East Sussex, of course; it is about all the councils up for reorganisation. Councils across the country that are due to have elections next year have received letters asking them whether they would consider cancelling them. Will the Minister set out the content of those letters, and will he stand with the Liberal Democrat by backing our amendments, which seek absolute assurances for councils across the country that are putting money into organising those elections?

Answer from The Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Steve Reed)

It does not surprise me that the Conservatives do not understand consultation, but it does surprise me that it is also difficult for the Liberal Democrats. We are engaging with the councils that will be affected. There is precedence for this where elections would result in only a very short term in office. Our intention, and my preference, is for the elections to go ahead. We want to cut the cost of politics, simplify decision making for local people, and deliver stronger economic growth and better public services in every part of the country.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The Secretary of State did not provide details of the letters or commit to supporting Liberal Democrat amendments.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email