Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Rail Connectivity

Thursday 20 November 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Lorraine Beavers asked about the lack of rail connectivity in Thornton and Fleetwood.
  • The Rail Minister acknowledged the importance of rail connectivity for community wellbeing.
  • The Minister offered to meet Lorraine Beavers to discuss the project further.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Lorraine Beavers Lab Blackpool North and Fleetwood
Context

The constituency of Thornton and Fleetwood once had a functional rail line that served the local community well. Now, there is only one main road route connecting the area.

Question

The cul-de-sac of Thornton and Fleetwood in my constituency once had a rail line that served the local community well. Now, there is only one main route in and out by road. It is acknowledged that lack of connectivity is a determinant of health, wealth and educational inequality. Will the Minister meet me to talk about reinstating the Fleetwood to Poulton railway link to open up opportunities for the people in my community?

Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Lilian Greenwood)

My hon. Friend is a great champion for her community. The Rail Minister has said that he will be happy to meet her to discuss the benefits and challenges of that project. She will know that we have had to prioritise funding during this spending review, and I am afraid that currently none is allocated to this project, but it is for Lancashire combined county authority to consider developing the proposal further. I am sure the Rail Minister will be happy to talk to her about that.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The request for immediate funding was not addressed; the answer focused on a future meeting and the need for local authorities to develop proposals.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)