Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

A59 Kex Gill Bypass

Thursday 20 November 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • The government has provided over 56 million towards the A59 Kex Gill bypass project.
  • Covering any cost increases beyond the initial funding is the responsibility of local authorities.
  • No further funding is available for the A59 Kex Gill bypass from the government.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Julian Smith Con Skipton and Ripon
Context

The A59 Kex Gill bypass scheme is experiencing delays and cost overruns due to design changes, poor ground conditions, and landslips. The project is vital for east-west transport in North Yorkshire.

Question

What discussions has the government had with North Yorkshire council on the progress of the development of the A59 Kex Gill bypass? This link is crucial for east-west transport connectivity. I urge Ministers to engage more frequently with the council, as cost overruns are now becoming a significant challenge, and it is vital that we complete the project.

Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Simon Lightwood)

Under the major road network programme, once the Department has approved a scheme and agreed its funding contribution, covering any cost increases is entirely a matter for local authorities. The Department has provided over £56 million towards A59 Kex Gill, and no further funding is available. However, I would be happy for my Department to provide advice to the Conservative-run council on how to deliver the scheme with the funding provided.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answerer did not address the request for more frequent discussions between the government and North Yorkshire Council but instead focused on explaining current financial responsibilities and offering advice.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email