Context
Concerns have been raised that procedural tactics might prevent Parliament from deciding on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. The Government's neutrality on the bill has sparked worry about the democratic process.
Question
Many of us are becoming concerned that technical or procedural manoeuvres outside this House may be used to prevent Parliament from reaching a decision on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. I presume the government is not neutral on the issue of democracy or the primacy of this Chamber. Will the Prime Minister reassure the House that the decision of elected Members—and, indeed, the wishes and hopes of the vast majority of the people we serve—will not be frustrated in this way?
Answer from The Prime Minister (Rishi Sunak)
I know the right hon. Gentleman feels strongly about this issue. As he says, the Government are neutral on the passage of the Bill. It is a matter of conscience; there are different and respected views across Parliament, and it is for Parliament to decide in the end on any changes in this Chamber. Scrutiny of the Bill in the Lords is a matter for the Lords, but the Government have a responsibility to ensure that any legislation that passes through Parliament is workable, effective and enforceable.
Not addressed: The Prime Minister did not provide a direct reassurance about procedural tactics hindering parliamentary decisions.
How: Scrutiny Of The Bill In The Lords Is A Matter For The Lords
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)