Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Coal Industry Social Welfare Organisation

Thursday 16 October 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Ministerial Questions took place on 2025-10-16 regarding the Coal Industry Social Welfare Organisation.
  • Ian Lavery questioned the organisation's current approach, citing issues with the CEO's enforcement of old covenants and lack of engagement with coalfield communities.
  • The Minister acknowledged the concerns and noted that charities must adhere to their legal frameworks, with the Charity Commission overseeing compliance.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

The MP noted the long-standing history of CISWO, established to support coalmining communities. He highlighted dissatisfaction with CISWO's operations, particularly regarding the eviction of a local football team from their grounds.

Question

CISWO dates back to the 1920s and was originally meant to support mining communities. However, many MPs are witnessing the opposite, citing the chief executive officer’s rigid enforcement of old covenants and lack of engagement with coalfield communities as major issues. In Blyth and Ashington, for example, CISWO's actions have led to the eviction of the Bedlington Terriers from their home ground after over 50 years. Will the Minister agree to meet me and the chair of the coalfield group to discuss how we can reverse this negative mindset of CISWO trustees?

Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport (Stephanie Peacock)

The Minister acknowledges the serious concerns raised by her hon. Friend regarding CISWO's role in coalfield communities. She is troubled by the example provided and emphasises that charities must adhere to their charitable purposes within legal frameworks. The Charity Commission acts as an independent regulator for such matters. The Minister expresses willingness to meet with the MP to discuss these issues further, inviting any Member of Parliament to join.

Partly answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email