Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Housing Delivery

Monday 14 July 2025 · 4 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Answered 4 Partly answered 0 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Ministerial comments highlighted delays caused by the Building Safety Regulator in handling applications for shovel-ready projects.
  • The Government's grey-belt development guidance was criticized for potentially rebranding green-belt land to circumvent planning restrictions.
  • Questions were raised about the insufficient number of wheelchair-accessible homes in Wandsworth's housing plan, prompting a commitment to consider the M4(2) standard for accessibility.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Danny Beales Lab Uxbridge and South Ruislip
Housing
Context

The MP noted delays in housing projects due to the Building Safety Regulator's performance, with applications taking months or years instead of weeks. The delays impact shovel-ready projects.

Question

I thank the Minister for his comments. When I speak to house builders, one of the issues they raise with me is the performance of the Building Safety Regulator. Shovel-ready projects that have planning permission are delayed at gateway 2, and checks that should take a matter of weeks are taking months, if not years. What is the Department doing to manage the performance of the regulator, ensure it has the resources it needs, and hold it to account, so that we get spades in the ground as soon as possible?

Answer from The Minister for Housing and Planning (Matthew Pennycook)

My hon. Friend is absolutely right to draw attention to the operation of the Building Safety Regulator, which, while essential to upholding building safety standards, is causing delays in handling applications for building projects, and is having an impact on new supply in London. I hope he will take comfort not only from the £2 million the Government allocated to the BSR in February, but from the targeted package of reforms we announced last month, including the establishment of a new fast-track process to reduce delays and strengthen leadership and governance.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q2 Oliver Dowden Con Hertsmere
Housing
Context

The MP raised concerns about the rebranding of green belt as grey belt in his constituency, citing an inconsistent application of rules which makes it hard to resist applications.

Question

The Government promised to increase housing delivery through grey-belt, not green-belt, development. Grey belt was described as ‘poor quality land, car parks and wasteland.’ However, since the new guidance was published, Hertsmere has been inundated with applications that simply seek to rebrand green belt as grey belt. The lack of clarity and the inconsistent application of the rules mean that such applications are hard to resist. Will the Minister provide greater clarity and tighten the rules before large swathes of Radlett, Bushey, Shenley, Potters Bar and Borehamwood succumb to urban sprawl?

Answer from The Minister for Housing and Planning (Matthew Pennycook)

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for that question. He cited the planning practice guidance we have issued, which has a very clear definition of the grey belt and the rules for it. When it comes to plan making, local authorities must take a sequential approach. On decision making for applications outside of local plans, he will know that we have imposed very strict laws to ensure viability assessments are not used on those sites. Where development comes forward and is judged to be appropriate by decision makers—and by the Planning Inspectorate in appeals—those golden rules will also ensure high levels of affordable housing, infrastructure and access to green space.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q3 Marsha De Cordova Lab Battersea
Housing
Context

The MP welcomed the government's plan to deliver more housing, but highlighted that only a small portion of Wandsworth’s planned homes are accessible for wheelchairs. The MP also asked about raising the default standard to M4(2).

Question

I welcome the Government’s bold and ambitious plan to deliver more housing, especially affordable and social homes, in Wandsworth. The council is already delivering homes, but of the 800 homes in its plan, only 50 are accessible for wheelchairs. How will the Government deliver more accessible homes, and will the Minister agree to raise the default standard to the M4(2) standard of accessibility and adaptation, so that everybody has the opportunity to live in a safe and accessible home?

Answer from The Minister for Housing and Planning (Matthew Pennycook)

I thank my hon. Friend for raising that point. I have a vague memory of certain parliamentary questions asking much the same, and I refer her to those answers. We want to ensure that all people have accessible homes. We are considering the M4(2) standard, and we will make announcements in due course about the accessibility of new homes in general.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q4 Vikki Slade Lib Dem Mid Dorset and North Poole
Housing Business & Trade
Context

The MP drew attention to a Competition and Markets Authority report that found major house builders were preventing competition, leading to higher prices and fewer affordable homes. The CMA has extracted £100 million for social housing from seven builders.

Question

The Competition and Markets Authority recently found that major house builders were preventing and distorting competition, including by matching prices and incentives to buyers. That further damages public confidence in house buying, and will have pushed home ownership out of the reach of many people. House builders have agreed to pay £100 million towards affordable housing schemes, but what redress is available for homeowners who have been misled? How will the Government achieve oversight of that funding to ensure that builders are held accountable, the additional homes are delivered, and there are effective disincentives to stop this happening again?

Answer from The Minister for Housing and Planning (Matthew Pennycook)

The hon. Lady draws the attention of the House to an incredibly important point. The Government are clear that the house building sector can thrive only when there is fair and open competition. Where that is found not to be the case, it is right that the CMA acts decisively, as it has done in this instance by extracting £100 million for social and affordable housing from the seven house builders investigated. We are taking action to fix our broken housing system, as I have said, by overhauling the planning system, addressing our dysfunctional land market, and ending our over-reliance on a speculative model of development that produces sub-optimal outcomes and constrains housing supply. If she has evidence of any individuals being directly affected in the purchase of their home, I would be very grateful if she could bring it to my attention.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)