Commons Sense

House of Commons · PMQs

PMQs

Wednesday 4 June 2025 · 2 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Key points

  • Sarah Dyke raised concerns about lawlessness deterring tourists and impacting local businesses ahead of the Glastonbury festival.
  • The Prime Minister committed to providing additional resources to the police, including 13,000 new neighbourhood officers and better powers to address antisocial behaviour.
  • David Davis called for a review of a case involving wrongful imprisonment and lack of compensation for victims of miscarriages of justice.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Sarah Dyke Lib Dem Glastonbury and Somerton
Context

The MP highlighted a notable increase in antisocial behaviour affecting the town of Glastonbury, mentioning that St John’s church was forced to close its doors after gravestones were reportedly used as counters for drug transactions. Constituents Peter and Melanie reported being targeted with demands for money when collecting their pensions, leaving them feeling scared and overwhelmed.

Question

The lawlessness is deterring tourists, and business owners have told me trade is suffering. As visitors start to arrive ahead of the Glastonbury festival, could the Prime Minister reassure my constituents that he will give the police the additional resource that they need to tackle this threatening and menacing behaviour, and to reduce the devastating crime wave sweeping through the town?

Answer from The Prime Minister

The hon. Member is absolutely right to raise this matter. Antisocial behaviour massively impacts on individuals and their communities, and that is why we are introducing 13,000 new neighbourhood police and giving them better powers—respect orders—so they can actually deal with what they see on the streets effectively.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q2 David Davis Con Goole and Pocklington
Context

The MP referred to a recommendation made by the Prime Minister in his book on “Miscarriages of Justice”, which suggested ways of preventing such incidents and swiftly addressing them. However, in 2014, people who had been wrongly imprisoned were allowed compensation only if they could prove their innocence beyond reasonable doubt.

Question

This ignored the decision of the court exonerating them, and meant that 93% of people who had been wrongfully imprisoned, and often had their lives destroyed, got no compensation whatsoever. This is an institutional miscarriage of justice. Will he instruct the Ministry of Justice to review this matter, and pay personal attention to getting this travesty of justice resolved?

Answer from The Prime Minister

The right hon. Member raises a really important issue that I am obviously aware of. It is right that victims of miscarriage can apply for compensation and appropriately do so, and I will take away what he says and have it looked at.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email