Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Armed Forces Recruitment and Retention

Monday 19 May 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Jamie Stone was once a Royal Navy cadet and believes the cadet force is important for recruitment and retention.
  • The Minister acknowledged Jamie Stone as a role model for cadet force achievements.
  • The Minister highlighted the importance of supporting those who work with cadets and train them.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Jamie Stone Lib Dem Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross
Context

The MP notes a recruitment and retention crisis inherited from the previous government. He references his own history as a Royal Navy cadet to emphasize the importance of cadet forces for both recruitment and retention.

Question

It may or may not come as a surprise to the House that I was once a Royal Navy cadet. I believe that the cadet force is hugely important to retention and recruitment. The trouble is getting people to step forward to help run cadet forces. I wonder whether the Government will consider some form of inducement scheme to encourage veterans—we know that every community has them—to step forward and help organise the cadets.

Answer from The Minister for the Armed Forces (Luke Pollard)

The hon. Gentleman is a role model for what someone can do by serving in the cadet forces. They are a fantastic way of growing in confidence, learning new skills and, for many young people, finding a career in the armed forces. Supporting those people who work with our cadets and help train them is vital. We know that there is a huge opportunity in expanding the cadets and investing more, and that is what the Government intend to do.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The Minister did not address whether an inducement scheme would be implemented specifically for encouraging veterans to help organize cadets.

How: Vague Commitment, General Statement

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)