Context
Rural villages in Steff Aquarone's constituency suffer from poor broadband access with no clear timeline for improvement. The community of Banningham is particularly affected, having endured poor access for years.
Question
Many rural villages in my constituency still suffer from poor broadband access, with no clear date for when it will get better and more demands for huge expenditure to get them connected to the network. I think particularly of residents in Banningham, who have suffered from poor broadband access for years and feel they are at the bottom of the pile. In Finland, the broadband roll-out started with the hardest-to-reach properties and reached inwards, tackling the biggest challenges first. Does the Minister agree that a roll-out strategy like that, rather than one that goes for the easiest properties first, would have served those communities better and faster?
Answer from The Minister for Data Protection and Telecoms (Chris Bryant)
Rural broadband coverage simply is not good enough. The largest chunk of broadband delivery will be done on a commercial basis by the private sector, but we do not want to use taxpayers’ money where it could probably be done commercially. I did not catch the name of the village that was mentioned, but if he has been to one of my Building Digital UK drop-in sessions and needs further information for that particular village, I would be very happy to try to sort it.
Not addressed: The Minister did not directly address whether a roll-out strategy similar to Finland's approach is better or faster, instead focusing on commercial delivery by the private sector.
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)