Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Arable Farms: Cost of Materials

Thursday 8 May 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Graeme Downie questioned the impact of imported grain on arable farms in Fife.
  • The Minister assured that imported products will continue to be subject to clear controls.
  • The Minister highlighted the positive news of a trade deal beneficial for Scotch whisky.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

Farmers in Graeme Downie's constituency are facing struggles due to high input costs and competition from imported grain. The Scotch Whisky Association welcomed a trade deal with India, which could increase demand for Scottish grain.

Question

Farms in my constituency and across Fife produce some of the highest quality grain in the world. However, many farmers are struggling to make a profit as imported grain is often produced at a different standard. That can undermine or undercut cereals grown in Scotland, which are produced to the highest standards. Scottish grain is a vital ingredient for high-quality Scotch whisky, and with the news this week of the trade deal with India, welcomed by the Scotch Whisky Association, demand for Scottish grain is likely to rise. What steps will the Minister take to increase standards for imported grain, and ensure profit for farmers in my constituency and a consistent supply for sectors including Scotch whisky?

Answer from The Minister for Food Security and Rural Affairs (Daniel Zeichner)

I can assure my hon. Friend that we will always maintain our high standards. All imported products will continue to be subject to clear controls, including limits for pesticide residues. I join him in sharing the really good news on that trade deal: it is good news for Scotch whisky and good news for British producers.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Steps to increase standards for imported grain were not addressed specifically; only assurances of maintaining high standards were provided.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)