Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

North Sea Oil and Gas Licences: Economic Growth

Wednesday 23 April 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 1 Partly answered 0 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Gregor Poynton asked the Secretary of State about the importance of investing in new technologies like hydrogen for a just transition in the oil and gas sector.
  • The UK Government announced on 7 April that eight Scottish projects were shortlisted for the next stage of the hydrogen allocation round 2 process.
  • The Secretary of State expressed eagerness to work with industry to deliver a vision for a thriving low-carbon, hydrogen economy in the UK.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Gregor Poynton Lab Livingston
Context

The question addresses the ongoing debate about transitioning from oil and gas to cleaner energy sources, focusing on the importance of supporting new technologies such as hydrogen. It references a specific project in Livingston that has been shortlisted for UK Government support.

Question

The Secretary of State rightly outlines how important the oil and gas sector is to Scotland, and to the workers and businesses that rely on it, but if we are to have a truly just transition, we need to invest in new technologies such as hydrogen. Will he, therefore, join me in welcoming the shortlisting of the Selms Muir hydrogen project in Livingston for UK Government support, and outline how that will benefit my constituency?

Answer from The Secretary of State for Scotland (Ian Murray)

On 7 April, the UK Government announced that eight Scottish projects had been shortlisted for the next stage of the hydrogen allocation round 2 process. My ministerial colleagues and I look forward to working with industry to deliver our vision for a thriving low-carbon, hydrogen economy in the UK. I commend my hon. Friend on the work he has done in pushing forward the project in his constituency.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)