Context
A constituent of Lee Barron faced difficulties after being served a section 21 notice by her landlord while under police protection due to domestic violence, leading to housing denial despite the necessity for custody of children.
Question
One of my constituents is a victim of domestic abuse and on a 999 priority list. She was served a section 21 notice by her landlord and denied band A housing by the council because, in order to keep custody of her children, she had signed a police protection order stating that she was not at risk of domestic violence. She was forced to choose between her children and a safe home. What is my hon. Friend doing to ensure that councils properly prioritise domestic abuse victims so that no one faces such an impossible choice?
Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Rushanara Ali)
I am so sorry to hear about the difficulties that my hon. Friend’s constituent has faced. That is horrific. He will be aware that the Government are focused on tackling violence against women, working across Departments and being led by the Home Secretary and the Deputy Prime Minister. Local authorities are strongly encouraged through statutory guidance to give priority for social housing to victims of domestic abuse and their families, particularly if they are homeless and require urgent rehousing. We are also taking action to exempt victims of domestic abuse from local connection tests, where they apply, to ensure that there are no barriers to victims accessing social housing.
Not addressed: The response acknowledged the issue but did not provide specific measures addressing eviction notices or prioritisation despite protective orders and custody concerns.
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)