Context
London has the highest demand for housing due to its economic needs, but targets have been cut despite the Mayor's failure to build needed houses.
Question
Demand for housing is greatest in London, which is where the economy most needs new homes. Building in London means less pressure on commuting infrastructure and house prices in places like rural Kent, but the housing targets for London have been cut. The Government justify that by saying that London has 'the biggest proposed percentage increase against delivery'. Why is the right hon. Lady rewarding the London Mayor’s failure to build Britain’s most needed houses with lower targets?
Answer from The Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Angela Rayner)
We are asking London to deliver record levels of house building. Our revised standard method sets the housing need for London at nearly 88,000 homes per year. The previous Government artificially boosted targets for London using an extra 35% urban uplift, resulting in a target of nearly 100,000 homes—a third of the national target—which could not be justified. The London Mayor has started building more new council homes than at any time since the 1970s and is getting on with building homes while the Tories failed.
Not addressed: The Secretary of State did not address why she rewards failure, but explained the rationale behind revised targets.
How: Changing Subject
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)