Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Project Spire

Thursday 3 April 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • The fund for healing, repair and justice is sourced from the Church Commissioners' endowment.
  • The fund addresses the Church of England's legacy links to the chattel enslavement of Africans.
  • The Church Commissioners will act in accordance with the charity's legal powers when managing the fund.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Katie Lam Con Weald of Kent
Context

The funds allocated to the Church of England’s reparations project are reportedly being used for parish church upkeep and clergy salaries, raising questions about the legality of redirecting these resources.

Question

The funds that have been committed to projects via the Church of England’s reparations project are in fact for the upkeep of parish churches and the provision of salaries for the clergy. I know that the Second Church Estates Commissioner is dedicated to our parish churches and would not support anything unlawful, so will the hon. Lady please provide the grounds on which the Church Commissioners are authorised to allocate this money to aims for which it was not intended? What details can she share of the conversations that she has had with the Charity Commission to determine whether they can do this, as it seems to be unlawful?

Answer from Marsha De Cordova (The Second Church Estates Commissioner)

The fund for healing, repair and justice is the Church Commissioners’ response to its legacy links to the chattel enslavement of Africans. The fund will be sourced from the endowment managed by the Church Commissioners, and the board will always act in accordance with the charity’s legal powers. Once discussions with the Charity Commission are completed, the board will take a formal decision on those next steps. The hon. Member will obviously agree that I cannot prejudge the outcome of those discussions.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Legal grounds and specific details of conversations

How: Cannot Prejudge The Outcome

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email